Internal conflict. Internal conflicts

intrapersonal conflict- this is a difficult to resolve contradiction that occurs within the personality. An intrapersonal psychological conflict is experienced by an individual as a serious problem of psychological content, which requires an early resolution. This kind of confrontation can simultaneously accelerate the process of self-development, forcing the individual to mobilize his own potential, and harm the individual, slowing down the process of self-knowledge and driving self-affirmation into a dead end. Intrapersonal conflict arises in conditions when interests, inclinations, needs of equal importance and opposite in direction collide with each other in the human mind.

The concept of intrapersonal conflict

The internal confrontation of the personality is called the confrontation that arises inside the psyche of the personality, which is a clash of contradictory, often oppositely directed motives.

This type of confrontation is characterized by a number of specific features. Features of intrapersonal conflict:

• unusual structure of the conflict (intrapersonal confrontation does not have subjects of interaction represented by individuals or groups of people);
• latency, which consists in the difficulty of identifying internal contradictions, since often the individual is not aware that he is in a state of confrontation, he can also hide his own state under a mask or vigorous activity;
• the specificity of the forms of manifestation and course, since the internal confrontation proceeds in the form of complex experiences and is accompanied by:, depressive states, stress.

The problem of intrapersonal conflict was most actively developed in Western psychological science. Its scientific justification is inextricably linked with the founder of psychoanalytic theory Z. Freud.

All approaches and concepts of intrapersonal conflict are conditioned by the specifics of understanding the content and essence of personality. Therefore, starting from the understanding of the personality that has developed in different psychological schools, we can distinguish several basic approaches to the consideration of internal confrontation.

Freud provided evidence of the biopsychological and biosocial content of intrapersonal confrontation. In essence, the human psyche is contradictory. Her work is connected with the constant tension and overcoming of the conflict that arises between biological desires and sociocultural foundations, between unconscious content and consciousness. It is precisely in contradiction and constant confrontation that the whole essence of intrapersonal confrontation lies, according to Freud's concept.

The described concept was further developed in the works of its adherents: K. Jung and K. Horney.

The German psychologist K. Levin put forward his own concept of intrapersonal conflict called "field theory", according to which the inner world of the individual falls simultaneously under the influence of polar forces. A person has to choose from them. Both of these forces can be positive or negative, and one of them can be negative and the other positive. K. Levin considered the main conditions for the emergence of conflict to be the parity and equal significance of such forces for the individual.

K. Rogers believed that the emergence of an internal conflict is due to the discrepancy between the subject's ideas about himself and his understanding of the ideal "I". He was convinced that such a mismatch could provoke serious mental disorders.

The concept of intrapersonal confrontation, developed by A. Maslow, is very popular. He argued that the structure is based on a hierarchy of needs, the highest of which is the need for. Hence, the main reason for the emergence of intrapersonal conflicts lies in the gap between the desire for self-realization and the achieved result.

Among the Soviet psychologists who made a significant contribution to the development of theories of confrontations, one can single out the concepts of intrapersonal conflict by A. Luria, V. Merlin, F. Vasilyuk and A. Leontiev.

Luria considered intrapersonal confrontation as a collision of two oppositely directed, but equal in strength, tendencies. V. Merlin - as a consequence of dissatisfaction with deep actual personal motives and relationships. F. Vasilyuk - as a confrontation between two internal motives that are displayed in the mind of an individual's personality as independent opposed values.

The problem of intrapersonal conflict was considered by Leontiev as a completely normal phenomenon. He believed that internal opposition is inherent in the structure of personality. Every personality is contradictory in its structure. Often the resolution of such contradictions is accomplished in the simplest variations and does not lead to the emergence of an intrapersonal conflict. Sometimes the resolution of the conflict goes beyond the boundaries of the simplest forms, becoming the main thing. The result of this is intrapersonal confrontation. He believed that the internal conflict is the result of the struggle of the personality's motivational courses ranked according to the hierarchy.

A. Adler considered the "inferiority complex" that arises in childhood under the pressure of an unfavorable social environment as the basis for the emergence of internal conflicts. In addition, Adler also identified the main methods for resolving internal confrontation.

E. Fromm, explaining intrapersonal confrontation, proposed the theory of "existential dichotomy". His concept was that the causes of internal conflicts lie in the dichotomous nature of the individual, which is found in the problems of being: the problem of the limited life of a person, life and death, etc.

E. Erickson in his own concept of the stages of psychosocial personality formation, putting forward the idea that each age stage is marked by a favorable overcoming of a crisis event or an unfavorable one.

With a successful exit, positive personal development occurs, its transition to the next life period with useful prerequisites for its favorable overcoming. With an unsuccessful exit from the crisis situation, the individual moves into a new period of his own life with the complexes of the previous stage. Erickson believed that it was practically impossible to go through all the stages of development safely, therefore, each individual develops the prerequisites for the emergence of intrapersonal confrontation.

Causes of intrapersonal conflict

Intrapersonal psychological conflict has three types of causes that provoke its occurrence:

• internal, that is, the reasons lurking in the contradictions of the personality;
• external factors determined by the status of the individual in society;
• external factors due to the status of the individual in a particular social group.

All of these types of causes are interrelated, and their differentiation is considered rather conditional. So, for example, internal factors that cause confrontation are the result of the interaction of the individual with the group and society, and do not appear out of nowhere.

The internal conditions for the emergence of intrapersonal confrontation are rooted in the confrontation of various motives of the personality, in the inconsistency of its internal structure. A person is more prone to internal conflicts when her inner world is complex, feelings of value and the ability to introspection are developed.

Intrapersonal conflict occurs in the presence of the following contradictions:

• between social norm and need;
• mismatch of needs, motives, interests;
• confrontation of social roles (intrapersonal conflict example: it is necessary to fulfill an urgent order at work and at the same time the child should be taken to training);
• the contradiction of socio-cultural values ​​and foundations, for example, it is necessary to combine the duty of defending the Motherland during the war and the Christian commandment “thou shalt not kill”.

For the emergence of a conflict within the personality, these contradictions must have a deep meaning for the individual, otherwise he will not attach importance to them. In addition, different aspects of contradictions in terms of the intensity of their own impact on the individual should be equal. Otherwise, the individual will choose the greater of the two blessings and the lesser of the “two evils”. In this case, internal confrontation will not arise.

External factors that provoke the emergence of intrapersonal confrontation are due to: personal status in a group, organization and society.

The reasons due to the position of the individual in a certain group are quite diverse, but they are united by the impossibility of satisfying various important motives and needs that have meaning and deep meaning for the individual in a particular situation. From here, four variations of situations that provoke the emergence of an intrapersonal conflict can be distinguished:

• physical obstacles that prevent the satisfaction of basic needs (intrapersonal conflict example: a prisoner who does not allow free movement in his cell);
• the absence of an object that is needed to satisfy a felt need (for example, a person dreams of a cup of coffee in a foreign city, but it is too early and all the cafeterias are closed);
• biological barriers (individuals with physical defects or mental retardation, in which the interference nests in the human body itself);
• social circumstances are the main root cause of most intrapersonal clashes.

At the organizational level, the causes that provoke the manifestation of intrapersonal conflict can be represented by the following types of contradictions:

• between excessive responsibility and limited rights for its implementation (a person was transferred to a managerial position, functions were expanded, but the rights remained old);
• between poor working conditions and harsh work requirements;
• between two incompatible tasks or jobs;
• between the rigidly established scope of the task and the vaguely prescribed mechanism for its implementation;
• between the requirements of the profession, traditions, norms established in the company and individual needs or values;
• between the desire for creative self-realization, self-affirmation, career and the potential for this within the organization;
• confrontation caused by the inconsistency of social roles;
• between the pursuit of profit and moral values.

External factors due to personal status in society are associated with discrepancies that arise at the level of the social macrosystem and lie in the nature of the social system, the structure of society, and political and economic life.

Types of intrapersonal conflicts

The classification of internal confrontation by type was proposed by K. Levin. He identified 4 types, namely equivalent (first type), vital (second), ambivalent (third) and frustrating (fourth).

Equivalent type- confrontation arises when the subject needs to perform two or more functions that are significant for him. Here, the usual model for resolving the contradiction is a compromise, that is, a partial substitution.

The vital type of conflict is observed when the subject has to make equally unattractive decisions for him.

Ambivalent type- clash occurs when similar actions and the result are equally seductive and repulsive.

Frustrating type. Features of an intrapersonal conflict of a frustrating type are disapproval by society, discrepancy with accepted norms and foundations, the desired result and, accordingly, the actions necessary to achieve the desired.

In addition to the above systematization, there is a classification, the basis of which is the value-motivational sphere of the individual.

Motivational conflict occurs when two equally positive tendencies, unconscious aspirations, come into conflict. An example of this type of confrontation is the Buridan donkey.

Moral contradiction or normative conflict arises from discrepancies between aspirations and duty, personal attachments and moral attitudes.

The clash of the desires of the individual with the reality that blocks their satisfaction provokes the emergence of a conflict of unfulfilled desires. For example, it appears when the subject, due to physical imperfection, cannot fulfill his desire.

Role intrapersonal conflict is anxiety caused by the inability to "play" several roles at the same time. It also occurs due to discrepancies in understanding the requirements that a person makes for the implementation of one role.

The adaptation conflict is characterized by the presence of two meanings: in a broad sense, it is a contradiction caused by an imbalance between the individual and the surrounding reality, in a narrow sense it is a collision caused by a violation of the social or professional adaptation process.

The conflict of inadequate self-esteem arises as a result of a discrepancy between personal claims and an assessment of one's own potential.

Resolution of intrapersonal conflict

According to the beliefs of A. Adler, the development of the character of the individual occurs before the age of five. At this stage, the baby feels the impact of many adverse factors that give rise to the emergence of an inferiority complex. In later life, this complex reveals a significant influence on the personality and intrapersonal conflict.

Adler described not only the mechanisms that explain the origin and manifestation of intrapersonal conflict, but also revealed ways to overcome such internal contradictions (compensation for an inferiority complex). He identified two such methods. The first is to develop social feeling and interest. Since, in the end, a developed social feeling manifests itself in the professional sphere, adequate interpersonal relationships. Also, an individual can develop an “undeveloped” social feeling, which has various negative forms of intrapersonal conflict: alcoholism, crime,. The second is to stimulate one's own potential, to achieve superiority over the environment. It can have the following forms of manifestation: adequate compensation (coincidence of the content of social interests with superiority), overcompensation (hypertrophied development of some kind of ability) and imaginary compensation (illness, circumstances or other factors beyond the control of the individual compensate for the inferiority complex).

M. Deutsch, the founder of the motivational approach to interpersonal conflict, identified ways to overcome intrapersonal confrontation, starting from the specifics of their "spheres of reality", to which he attributed:

• the objective situation of confrontation, which is the foundation of the contradiction;
• conflict behavior, which is a way of interaction between the subjects of conflict confrontation that arises when a conflict situation is recognized.

Ways to overcome internal confrontation are open and latent.

Open paths include:

• decision making by the individual;
• ending doubts;
• fixation on the solution of the problem.

Latent forms of intrapersonal conflict include:

• simulation, torment, ;
• sublimation (transition of mental energy to other areas of functioning);
• compensation (replenishment of the lost through the acquisition of other goals and, accordingly, results);
• escape from reality (fantasy, dreaming);
• nomadism (change of professional sphere, place of residence);
• rationalization (self-justification with the help of logical conclusions, purposeful selection of arguments);
• idealization (separation from reality, abstraction);
• regression (suppression of desires, recourse to primitive behavioral forms, avoidance of responsibility);
• euphoria (sham fun, joyful state);
• differentiation (mental separation of thoughts from the author);
• projection (the desire to get rid of negative qualities by attributing them to another).

To analyze personality and intrapersonal conflict, to understand the psychological problems of the origin and overcoming of conflicts is necessary for the further successful development of communication skills, competent resolution of situations of confrontation in interpersonal interaction and group communication.

Consequences of intrapersonal conflicts

It is believed that intrapersonal conflict is an inseparable element in the formation of the individual's psyche. Therefore, the consequences of internal confrontations can carry a positive aspect (that is, be productive) for the individual as well as a negative one (that is, destroy personal structures).

A confrontation is considered positive if it has the maximum development of opposing structures and is characterized by minimal personal costs for its resolution. One of the tools for harmonizing personal development is constructively overcome intrapersonal confrontation. The subject is able to recognize his personality only by resolving internal confrontation and intrapersonal conflicts.

Intrapersonal confrontation can help develop an adequate one, which, in turn, contributes to personal self-realization and self-knowledge.

Internal conflicts are considered destructive or negative, which exacerbate the splitting of personality, turn into crises, or contribute to the formation of reactions of a neurotic nature.

Acute internal confrontations often lead to the destruction of the existing interpersonal interaction at work or relationships in the family circle. As a rule, they become the causes of increase, restlessness, anxiety, during communicative interaction. A long intrapersonal confrontation conceals a threat to the effectiveness of the activity.

In addition, intrapersonal confrontations are characterized by a tendency to develop into neurotic conflicts. Anxiety inherent in conflicts can be transformed into a source of disease if they take a central place in the system of personal relationships.

intrapersonal conflict one of the most complex psychological conflicts that is played out in the inner world of a person. It is difficult to imagine a person who would never experience an intrapersonal conflict in his life. Moreover, a person has to deal with such conflicts in his life constantly. Constructive intrapersonal conflict is an integral part of the development of his psyche.

Destructive intrapersonal conflict leads to quite serious consequences, from severe experiences that cause, to an extreme form of its resolution -. It should be emphasized that the internal conflict situation is constantly present in each of us and this should not be feared. For a mentally healthy person, an internal conflict situation at the “background” level is a completely natural state. The German philosopher I. believed that a person who always has a calm conscience and who is not tormented by doubts cannot be highly moral. The great Slavic philosopher V. Solovyov, in opposition to the Western European rationalism of Descartes - "I think, therefore I exist" - opposed his thesis, taking into account the peculiarities of the Slavic mentality - "I am ashamed, therefore I exist." The problem of intrapersonal conflict is the main one for the main characters in the works of A. Pushkin (the famous letter of Tatyana), the novel "War and Peace" by L.N. Tolstoy (the experiences of Pierre Bezukhov, Count Bolkonsky, Natasha Rostova), characters in the novels of F. Dostoevsky, Ya. Kolos, I. Melezh. The problem of the rebellious Slavic soul is central to almost all works of the classics of Russian and Belarusian literature.

The state of a certain intrapersonal tension and inconsistency of the psyche is not only natural, but also necessary for the development and improvement of the personality itself, which cannot be carried out without resolving internal contradictions. The presence of contradictions is the basis for the emergence of conflict. If an intrapersonal conflict situation proceeds at the background level, an intrapersonal conflict is necessary. Dissatisfaction with oneself, a critical attitude towards oneself make a person strive for self-improvement, self-realization and self-actualization, thereby a person fills not only his life with meaning, but also improves the surrounding reality.

The problem of intrapersonal conflict most actively developed and is being developed in Western psychology. The beginning of its scientific substantiation was laid at the end of the 19th century and is associated with the name of the founder in psychology.

Features of approaches to the consideration of intrapersonal conflicts are determined by the peculiarity of understanding the essence of personality, which has developed in various psychological schools. Proceeding from this, a number of main directions for the consideration of intrapersonal conflict can be distinguished.

Z. Freud substantiated the biopsychological, biosocial nature of the intrapersonal conflict. The human psyche is inherently contradictory. Its functioning is associated with constant tension and overcoming the contradiction between the biological drives and desires of a person and socio-cultural norms, between the unconscious and consciousness. According to Sigmund Freud, this contradiction and constant confrontation is the essence of intrapersonal conflict. This theory was further developed in the work of his followers: - regression to a lower level of the psyche, - clash of desires for satisfaction and security, the contradiction of "neurotic needs", etc.

Intrapersonal conflict according to Freud:
- Biological drives and desires (Unconscious);
- Socio-cultural norms (Conscious).

A rather original theory of intrapersonal conflict, called "field theory", was put forward by a German psychologist. According to this theory, the inner world of the individual is simultaneously under the influence of oppositely directed forces. And the subject must make a choice in favor of one of them. These forces can be both negative and positive, or one of them is positive and the other is negative.

The main conditions for the emergence of the conflict, according to K. Levin, is the approximate equality and significance of these forces for the individual.

According to the theory of personality "I-concept", the occurrence of an intrapersonal conflict is due to the discrepancy between the idea of ​​the individual about himself ("") with the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe ideal "I". In his opinion, this mismatch can lead to serious mental disorders, up to mental illness.

Quite popular is the theory of intrapersonal conflict, developed by. Since, in his opinion, the structure of the personality is formed by the corresponding hierarchy of needs (5-level pyramid of needs), and the highest of them is the need for self-realization, the main reason for the emergence of an intrapersonal conflict lies in the gap in most people between the desire for self-actualization and the actually achieved result.

In modern conditions, the theory of intrapersonal conflict, developed by the Austrian psychologist and psychiatrist Viktor Frankl, the creator of a new scientific direction of logotherapy, the science of “the meaning of human existence and the search for this meaning,” enjoys a certain popularity. In his opinion, intrapersonal conflict is the result of a disorder of the "spiritual core" of the personality, caused by a spiritual, creative vacuum, the loss of the meaning of life. Intrapersonal conflict manifests itself in noogenic (nusogenic), which manifest themselves in apathy, boredom,.

Among Russian scientists who have made a significant contribution to the development of the problem of intrapersonal conflict, A. Luria (a collision of two strong, but oppositely directed tendencies), V. Merlin (as a result of acute dissatisfaction with deep actual motives and personality relationships), F. Vasilyuk (a collision of two internal motives, reflected in the form of independent opposite values), etc. But, first of all, attention should be paid to the activity approach. According to A. Leontiev, intrapersonal conflict is inherent in the internal structure of the personality and is a normal phenomenon. In its structure, any is contradictory. Usually the resolution of these contradictions occurs in the simplest forms and does not lead to the emergence of an intrapersonal conflict. “After all, a harmonious personality is not at all a personality that does not know any internal struggle.” But in some cases, the resolution of these contradictions goes beyond the simplest forms and becomes the main thing that determines the behavior and the whole appearance of a person. As a result, intrapersonal conflict arises. In his opinion, intrapersonal conflict is the result of the struggle of hierarchical, motivational lines of personality. Among domestic psychologists, approaches to the consideration of the intrapersonal conflict of N.F. Vishnyakova.

Having considered the basic concepts of intrapersonal development, it is necessary to formulate its definition. There is no single point of view on this issue in the conflictological literature. Intrapersonal conflict is designated by various authors as personal, internal, intrasubjective, intrapersonal, psychological.

So after all, what socio-psychological phenomenon is understood as an intrapersonal conflict?

Despite the variety of its definitions, there are a number of parameters that unite them all. These should include:
- intrapersonal conflict appears as a result of the interaction of internal elements of the structure of the personality psyche;
- the subjects ("S") of the intrapersonal conflict are simultaneously diverse and conflicting interests, goals, and desires existing in the personality;
- intrapersonal conflict occurs only when the contradictions are equal and significant for the individual;
- internal conflict is accompanied by sharp negative emotions.

Thus, an intrapersonal conflict is an acute negative experience caused by a protracted struggle between the structures of the inner world of a person, reflecting contradictory connections with the social environment and delaying decision making.

The basis of any intrapersonal conflict is a situation characterized by:
- inconsistency of positions;
- the opposite of motives, goals and interests;
- the opposite of means to achieve goals in specific conditions;
- the inability to satisfy any need and at the same time the impossibility of satisfying it.

Intrapersonal conflict has a number of features that are important to consider when identifying, preventing and resolving it.

Features of intrapersonal conflict:
- Specificity of structural components;
- latency;
- Specificity of forms of manifestation;
- The specificity of the forms of leakage.

The modern classification (typology) of intrapersonal conflict is very diverse.

One of the most common is the 3-level classification of intrapersonal conflict, which is built on the basis of the emergence of contradictions between the need and the social norm.

The most complete classification of intrapersonal conflicts is contained in the work of A.Ya. Antsupova and A.I. Shipilov, who took the value-motivational sphere of personality as a basis for classification.

Depending on which sides of the inner world of the individual come into conflict, they identified the following main types of intrapersonal conflict (the value-motivational sphere of the individual).

If any of the above conflicts is not resolved for a long time, it can lead to stress, frustration and its rather dangerous form - NEUROTIC conflict - characterized by the highest tension and confrontation of the internal forces of the individual.

The above typology of intrapersonal conflicts does not fully exhaust their classification. Depending on other grounds, a different typology can be given. So, if we take as a basis the function of an intrapersonal conflict, then it can be classified as: Constructive or destructive.

Constructive (functional, productive) conflict contributes to the maximum development of the subjects of the conflict and constructive personal costs for its resolution.

A destructive (dysfunctional, unproductive) conflict exacerbates a split personality, develops into a life crisis, and, as a rule, leads to a neurotic conflict.

If a person has no desire to develop, he has no taste for life, and panic attacks have become constant companions - this is not yet an internal Psychologist who will quickly cope with such problems. It is worse if a person does not understand his thoughts. Here it is already worth sounding the alarm.

Definition

Internal conflict is the contradictions that arise in a person in the subconscious. The patient most often does not understand what it is and describes his situation as emotional problems that cannot be solved.

Depression is an indispensable companion of the internal conflict of the personality and depends only on the person whether he can overcome it or not.

A person suffering from internal conflict thinks negatively, he lacks rational thinking.

It is important to know that a neglected form of conflict leads to neurotic and even mental illness. Therefore, it is so important to worry in time and start treatment. It will depend on how large the internal conflict is. This means that the specialist will first have to classify the problem and only then take on its solution.

Classification of conflicts

First of all, a person who understands that he has a problem must familiarize himself with the terms. Indeed, most often people come at an already advanced stage, and then the work of only a psychologist gives a small result.

To date, scientists distinguish only two types of internal conflicts:

1. Human feelings do not correspond to the rules of society.
2. Disagreement with society or the presence of irritating factors have a bad effect on the subtle mental organization of a person.

Also highlight the levels of contradictions. The latter appear in a person in the subconscious.

1. The balance of the patient's inner world.
2. Internal conflict.
3. Life crisis.

The first level is determined by the fact that a person resolves internal conflicts himself.

But an internal conflict is when a person cannot solve his problems. In this case, all areas of life fail, and the conflict only gets worse.

The crisis of life is determined by the impossibility of implementing the plans and programs drawn in the head. Until the contradiction is resolved, a person cannot even perform the necessary vital functions.

It must be understood that all contradictions of any level are subject to resolution. It all depends on how high they are and whether it is possible to eliminate them or refuse them.

In order for the balance of the inner world to be disturbed, only personal characteristics are not enough. There must be suitable situations. They are external and internal. The external ones include the satisfaction of deep motives. An example would be a situation where satisfied needs give rise to other needs; or fighting with nature.

But internal situations are internal conflicts of the sides of the personality. That is, a person realizes that the situation is difficult to solve, which means that contradictions have significant power.

Different scientists interpret the causes of intrapersonal conflict in different ways. Most of them are inclined to the version that the reasons are:

1. The reasons lie in the human psyche.
2. Causes that stem from what place a person occupies in society.
3. Causes that are influenced by the position of a person occupied in his social group.

But the isolated causes are not isolated. Internal conflict is influenced not by one, but by many reasons. That is, their separation is very ephemeral.

By identifying the causes, you can determine the type of personality conflict.

Reasons for the inconsistency of the human psyche

The internal causes of contradiction in the human psyche are:

1. The clash of personal needs and social norms.
2. Divergence of social role and status.
3. Mismatches of norms and values ​​of society.
4. conflict of interest.

All causes of intrapersonal conflict are due to the fact that a person cannot satisfy his fundamental needs and life motives. And if they mean a lot to a person or a deep meaning is invested in them, then this only exacerbates the problem.

External causes that are associated with the position of a person in his social group include:

1. A physical obstacle that makes it impossible to meet your needs.
2. Physiological resources that do not allow you to satisfy the need.
3. In order to satisfy the needs, there is no object.
4. Social conditions that make the satisfaction of needs impossible.

In addition to the causes of intrapersonal conflict associated with social status, there are also causes that are related to social organization. The following points can be highlighted:

1. The discrepancy between the working conditions and the requirements that apply to the result.
2. The difference between rights and responsibilities.
3. Organizational values ​​do not match the personal values ​​of the employee.
4. The social role does not correspond to the status in society.
5. There is no opportunity to create and self-actualize.
6. Tasks and requirements are put forward such that they exclude each other.

In modern realities, it is often the cause of conflict that moral norms come into dissonance with the desire to make a profit. But more often than not, this happens only when a person begins to save his first money and look for a place in life.

All because in market relations a person is forced to compete with other people, which means that sooner or later hostility to society will turn into hostility towards oneself. This is how the internal conflict begins. In our society, absolutely opposite things are required from a participant in market relations. He must be aggressive in order to win his place, but at the same time cultivate altruism and other virtues in himself. It is precisely such mutually exclusive demands that are fertile ground for internal conflict.

Benefits of internal conflict

If a person has found symptoms of a conflict in himself, then what should he do? It depends on the individual. If a person is strong in spirit, then an internal conflict will push him to a reassessment of values, a change in some beliefs.

Psychologists specializing in intrapersonal conflicts identify the following positive factors:

1. A person who is in conflict mobilizes his forces and finds a way out of the situation.
2. The patient soberly assesses the situation, looking at it from the side. Thus, he can rethink his problems and solve them.
3. A person's self-esteem rises after he solves his problem.
4. Rational thinking appears, which does not work with intrapersonal conflict.
5. A person cognizes himself, which means that through inner harmony he relates better to society.
6. While a person is looking for a solution to his problems, he may discover a potential that he did not suspect because of low self-esteem.

But in order to get it all, you should not be shy and seek help from a specialist. In this case, you do not need to self-medicate, because only a few can really solve the problem. An aggravating circumstance is that neurotic illnesses, which are present at an advanced stage of the conflict, only complicate the search for solutions.

The danger of conflict

As harmless as this term may sound, it should not be underestimated. Of course, much depends on the individual, but nevertheless, the negative consequences manifest themselves in the same way for everyone, just for someone in a more vivid form. So, internal conflict is what prevents a person from revealing his personality, establishing communication with other people. A person cannot show his strengths and from this begins to burn out.

Internal contradictions become a permanent cause for suffering. I don’t want to do anything, my hands drop, the feeling of inner emptiness grows, and self-confidence is melting before our eyes.

If left untreated, the problem can lead to a nervous breakdown. And this person will get off easy. Launched intrapersonal conflict leads to serious psychiatric diseases. Therefore, you should not start the problem and think that it will resolve itself. It will not resolve, which means you need to look for a good specialist.

Multiple personalities

There is such a phenomenon in psychiatry. What should be done in such a situation? Contact a professional. But treatment doesn't always work.

An example is a story that happened in America. American Billy Milligan was convicted, but when he appeared in the courtroom, he did not understand what was happening. The jurors listened to several people, and everything would be fine, but only the defendant spoke the whole process. His habits changed, his manner of speaking, and even an accent appeared. Billy could act cheeky, smoke in the courtroom, dilute his monologue with prison jargon. And after two minutes the voice became higher, coquettishness appeared in the behavior, and the accused began to express himself very gracefully.

After all sorts of research, scientists came to the conclusion that Billy had a diagnosis of "multiple personality disorder." There were twenty-four completely formed personalities in his mind. Periodically, he felt like an attractive woman, then a politician, then a small child or a prisoner.

Still, this is an extreme state of internal conflict. As a rule, with timely access to a doctor, such complications can be avoided.

Forms of intrapersonal conflict

To determine how to get rid of internal conflict, you need to understand in what form it manifests itself. There are six forms:

1. Neurasthenia. A person becomes irritable, working capacity decreases, he does not sleep well. Frequent headaches appear, sleep is disturbed. Depression becomes a constant companion. In fact, neurasthenia is one of the types of neurosis. And there is such a neuropsychic disorder, because the internal conflict is resolved incorrectly or ineffectively. Neurasthenic symptoms usually occur when a person is exposed to factors that injure his psyche for a long time.
2. Euphoria. A person becomes excessively cheerful in public, expresses his positive emotions without caring about the appropriateness of the situation, laughs with tears in his eyes. This form of conflict is characterized by psychomotor arousal and activity - both mimic and motor.
3. Regression. One who has this form of conflict begins to behave very primitively and tries to avoid responsibility for his actions. This is a kind of psychological protection, that is, a person consciously returns to where he felt protected. If a person begins to regress, then this is a direct sign of a neurotic or infantile personality.
4. Projection. This form is characterized by the fact that the person begins to attribute shortcomings to another person, to criticize other people. The form was called classical projection or protection, which implies its connection with psychological protection.
5. Nomadism. Man gravitates towards frequent changes. This may be a constant change of partner, job or place of residence.
6. Rationalism. In this form of conflict, a person tends to justify his actions and actions. That is, a person tries to reformulate his true motives, feelings and thoughts so that his own behavior does not cause protest. This behavior can be explained by the fact that a person wants to respect himself and maintain dignity in his own eyes.

Ways to resolve the conflict

If a person does not understand the problem of internal conflict and does not want to turn to psychologists, then you can try to cope with the phenomenon on your own. But you still have to attract close people. So, there are several ways to resolve conflicts and disagreements. Let's consider each separately.

Compromise

To resolve the internal conflict, you can try compromise solutions. That is, before you solve the problem, you need to give yourself the appearance of a choice. For example, where to go: tennis or chess? And then you need to choose the third option, for example, athletics. Don't give yourself a chance to doubt.

You should not always try to choose, you can combine - this is a compromise. After all, to cook sandwiches with ham and cheese, you do not need to choose in the store what to buy: cheese or ham. To satisfy the need, you should take both this and that, and a little bit.

You can also refuse to solve the problem and become a fatalist. That is, a person accepts everything that fate gives, and does not interfere with the course of events.

There is an example when a person was cured of an internal conflict, just by closing his mind to thoughts that he considers unacceptable. This man's name is William Stanley Milligan, and he simply refused to implement what he considered unacceptable for himself.

To successfully cope with the problem, sometimes it is enough to adapt to certain circumstances. But this behavior should not become a habit. But it is very necessary to correct your own foundations and values.

dreams

Some experts advise embellishing problems, thereby starting to fantasize. This means that a person will live in his fantasies and all his "wants and musts" will not conflict with each other. But still, most psychologists do not take this method seriously. In their opinion, it is better not to hide behind fantasies, but to cheer yourself up in difficult situations. The phrase that there are no hopeless situations is perfect for this purpose.

Acceptance of one's own worth

Each person has strengths, and in order to find them, a person needs to understand himself. Most often, people do not pay due attention to their achievements. Therefore, they constantly complain that they do not have enough opportunities. But the point is not the lack of the latter, but the fact that a person does not want to see ways to solve the problem. We can say that internal conflict is a biased attitude of a person towards himself. And all you need to do is sit down and think about how a person compares favorably with the rest. If you find in yourself something that deserves respect and is a strength, then overcoming internal conflicts will cease to be a problem.

Conflicts arise mainly due to the fact that a person does not understand himself what he is valuable for, but tries to prove it to others. No one will mock and humiliate a strong person, because he respects himself, which means that others respect him.

purpose

Internal conflicts destroy a person, because in this struggle there are only losers. A person with pleasure shifts responsibility for himself to other people or adapts to society. But if a person has found his destiny, then inner harmony is restored. The personality becomes strong and, thanks to the internal attitude, does not allow something to be imposed on itself or to confuse itself.

Simply put, to be happy you need a favorite thing. It will be a source of good emotions, inspiration and vitality. It is a person who understands his destiny, strong in spirit, happy and able to solve any problems.

Care

The person consciously avoids solving the problem. It is not necessary to make a difficult choice, which means that the person experiences relief for a certain period. In fact, a person simply waits for the problem to disappear by itself, and if it does not disappear, then the conflict only gets worse.

Sublimation

The internal conflict is resolved by this method due to the fact that the person translates psychic energy into acceptable forms. This is one of the most effective methods, as it allows not only to find the cause, but also to influence it. The ability to sublimate must be developed by constant exercises, despite the fact that all people have it.

Reorientation

In this way, people must first understand the reason that provoked the conflict, and who or what provoked it. In order to apply reorientation, you need to master the ability to manage motivation. The method is not fast, but the result is guaranteed to be excellent. If you can’t figure out your own value system on your own, then you need to contact a specialist. Under the guidance of a psychologist, it will be much easier to get rid of the conflict.

crowding out

If a person tries to force out unacceptable thoughts and motives for himself, then this is also considered a way to get rid of the conflict. Usually infantile immature personalities resort to this method. It is easier for them to forget something or forbid themselves to think about it than to try to eliminate the cause. The position of the ostrich in the sand is not effective, if only because not noticing the problem does not mean eradicating it. The likelihood of a recurrence of the conflict is high, and it is not a fact that it will not be in a more serious form.

Correction

Every person has some ideas about himself. The essence of the method lies in the fact that the struggle is not with the cause of the conflict, but with the individual's own ideas about it. That is, it is easier not to look for ways to eradicate the cause, but simply to change the attitude towards the latter. The effect of the method is rather average, although there are people whom it really helped. In general, if a person understands that he has a problem and needs to be solved, then he himself must choose the ways to solve it. After all, the result depends to a greater extent on self-confidence.

Conclusion

1. Intrapersonal conflict is a serious problem that should not be underestimated. Lack of proper attention and search for ways to resolve the conflict can lead to numerous diseases, including psychiatric ones.
2. There are quite a few reasons for the internal conflict, which means that you do not need to act on advice on the Internet or from friends. Everyone has different situations and reasons for this or that behavior. Just because it works for one person doesn't mean it will work for another. It is best to go to a psychologist, because only a specialist will help to understand the causes and eliminate them.
3. There are also many ways to resolve an intrapersonal conflict, but the same principle applies here as with the causes. Whatever the negative reviews about this or that method, only a person should choose how to solve their problems. If he feels that this is how he can get rid of the conflict, then you should not rely on the opinions of others.

In conclusion, it is worth noting: in order to solve the problem once and for all, you need to know how it is done. And only a specialist knows this. Therefore, do not neglect the help of professionals, because they exist for this - to help you understand yourself.

intrapersonal conflict Intrapersonal conflict is always characterized by strong feelings, as it affects our individual motives and thoughts.

Intrapersonal conflict is a contradiction in the views, values ​​of a person regarding himself, his life. This problem is rapidly developing now, when people, due to certain circumstances, make too many demands on themselves. Intrapersonal conflict is always characterized by strong feelings, as it affects our individual motives and thoughts. A conflict of such a plan can mature and develop over the years, at a certain stage without interfering with the personality to fully exist. However, at some point, dissatisfaction with oneself, with one's achievements, becomes too obvious. Then the intrapersonal conflict manifests itself in its entirety. Why is it dangerous, what are its features and reasons for its formation? Let's try to figure it out!

Causes of intrapersonal conflict

Like any conflict, this one also has its reasons. These reasons usually affect a person's attitude towards his own personality. When we even subconsciously disapprove of some of our actions and even thoughts, we gradually learn to remain more and more dissatisfied with ourselves.

Unmet expectations

There are many demands placed on modern man in society. Sometimes a false impression is created that a successful person never gets tired, always does the job efficiently. In fact, this is just an appearance, an image imposed by society, which everyone is trying to unconditionally follow. A person cannot constantly exist at the limit of his capabilities. Gradually, she accustoms herself to the fact that she lives incorrectly, not like all other people. Unjustified expectations are the main reason why intrapersonal conflict begins to develop. A person feels that he does not correspond to some norms, he cannot influence the situation that oppresses him.

Disappointment in yourself

A common cause of the development of intrapersonal conflict, which makes you give up. It seems to a person that he is not capable of anything, but can only make various mistakes. Self-disappointment can result from failure in meaningful activities. Problems at work for a long time unsettle, deprive self-confidence. If a project fails, then thoughts about their own failure often come to mind. Disappointment in oneself contributes to the aggravation of intrapersonal conflict. People often drive themselves into terrible experiences precisely because they want to achieve great results, but in fact they deprive themselves of moral strength.

Social norms and personal needs

These categories often come into conflict with each other. The conflict is formed when a person feels unable to realize his own desires for one reason or another. Many people find it necessary to comply with the laws of society, even if these requirements are contrary to their own ideas about life. For some, social norms are too important and significant to be ignored. In this case, the personality often remains lost, unclaimed. When individual needs are not met, most simply give up and do not want to make even the slightest attempt to change their lives anymore.

Low self-esteem

This is a serious problem, which in itself provokes intrapersonal conflict. If for some reason a person cannot realize his potential, then this circumstance puts enormous pressure on him, makes him doubt himself. Low self-esteem keeps you from being successful. Even if a person is talented enough, she does not find in herself a resource for achievements. She has to constantly be in an internal struggle, proving to herself the right to self-expression, and such a circumstance is very morally exhausting. The inability to value oneself is a common reason for the formation of conflict.

Types of intrapersonal conflicts

Intrapersonal conflict has several types of expression. In any case, the contradiction must be eliminated as soon as possible.

Moral discrepancy

It appears as a result of the values ​​of a particular individual are very different from the ideas of society. In matters of morality and morality, there are too many restrictions that sometimes prevent a happy self-perception. A person often finds himself in a situation where his desires are not only not satisfied, but also subject to universal condemnation. I must say that not everyone is able to overcome such an obstacle. Many give up their desires only because they do not know how to properly fight for them.

Motivational conflict

In this case, we are talking about the fact that interests that have an equivalent value for a person collide with each other. He cannot give up one thing in favor of another without experiencing tremendous guilt or disappointment. You need strong motivation in order to take action, to really change your life.

The conflict of unfulfilled desires

This type of conflict is very common. The innermost desires of a person in reality always face certain obstacles. It is not always possible to cope with them even with support. If an individual lacks self-confidence, then it will be difficult for him to follow the voice of his own heart. Often people put off achieving their goals just because they don't know how to resolve the conflict. By giving up our dreams, we doom ourselves to an unhappy existence. The individual practically ceases to experience joy and begins to live only with everyday worries. The conflict of unfulfilled desires puts too much pressure on the psyche. It can even interfere with building a happy life, as it will constantly remind you of its existence.

frustrating conflict

The very concept of frustration means that a person refuses something that is of great importance to him. The frustrating conflict emphasizes that the person is fixated too much on possible failure, and this is what prevents her from moving forward in life. Getting used to giving up our own needs, we cannot fully develop, because we ourselves deprive ourselves of joy.

Resolution of intrapersonal conflict

Whatever causes an intrapersonal conflict, it necessarily needs to be resolved. If this is not done in time, then there is a great risk that a person will spend a lot of time in contradictions that will poison him all his life. This kind of conflict does not allow you to fully enjoy life, enjoy your own achievements and new discoveries. How to move towards conflict resolution? What steps should be taken in this case?

Decision-making

This is the very first step, without which all the rest will be impossible. Man needs to take responsibility for his own well-being. Nobody else can do it for him. That is why intrapersonal conflict is too serious a thing to try to ignore. You need to understand in advance that making a firm decision will help direct your thoughts in the right direction, free you from endless rushing through life in search of a better life. There is no need to run away from yourself.

Inner harmony

Living in harmony with oneself is the dream of every person who knows the true price of happiness. Whatever circumstances prevent you from enjoying life, you can not give up. The resolution of the internal conflict cannot take place without the formation of such an understanding. It is necessary to strive to begin to realize your true desires and needs. This will help you release conflict by setting your own boundaries. Nothing compares to the feeling of inner harmony.

Focus on the task

Each person should have a goal in life that will inspire him to new achievements, really lead him forward and force him to develop. Often the presence of intrapersonal conflict in every possible way prevents self-realization. The individual worries too much about possible failure. In some cases, people stop acting altogether so as not to face disappointment. Of course, this approach does not solve the problem in any way, but only exacerbates it significantly. The ability to focus on the task at hand will help resolve intrapersonal conflict. You need to clearly imagine the whole sequence of actions. Overcoming the difficulties that arise is necessary in order to strengthen the character, to increase self-confidence and one's strengths.

Escape from doubt

So many people are afraid to make a mistake, thereby getting disappointed in their abilities. You don't have to be constantly in doubt. Failures happen to everyone, but they do not destroy a strong personality, but only show the trajectory of the desired movement. If you are in a pronounced conflict with yourself for a long time, then it is simply necessary to first free yourself from doubts. Fear greatly complicates the situation: they prevent you from acting, making responsible decisions. Freed from anxiety and doubt, you can reach incredible heights, get closer to your dream.

substitution

When it is not possible to cope with some kind of contradiction, it is necessary to try to understand the situation well. In some cases, it may be necessary to replace something with a need that cannot yet be realized without significant losses. By resorting to such a scheme, you can maintain peace of mind and at the same time come to a solution to an intrapersonal conflict. The problem is that such a conflict cannot be ignored. Otherwise, he can imperceptibly subjugate the personality to himself, make him even more doubtful of the available opportunities.

Thus, intrapersonal conflict is a problem that significantly reduces the quality of life. As a rule, such a conflict always indicates what a person needs to pay attention to, what he has to work on. Attention to one's own personality will help to get rid of a painful state of mind. If it is not possible to resolve the problem on your own, seek help from the center of psychology of Irakli Pozharisky. Working with a psychologist will help restore your peace of mind, restore lost strength. Individual consultations are necessary to understand the origins of the conflict, only after that it can be resolved.

New Popular

Emotional dependence is a state of mind in which a person cannot fully rely on himself. It is especially affected by […]

Psychological health of a person today is one of the most popular topics related directly to self-development. Most people pay attention to their own feelings. […]

Many women are familiar with the concept of postpartum depression. It would seem, where does the feeling of hopelessness and apathy come from in such a joyful period in life? […]

Fear of dogs is quite common, especially if a person has experienced an attack by an animal in the past. Similar […]

Many people are anxious on the eve of significant events, important events, and fateful changes. As a rule, a person feels excited and agitated when […]

Shyness is an explosive mixture of various unfavorable components of the inner world. A shy person is shy, indecisive, fearful. It is covered by a spectrum of negative […]

A typical phenomenon of our time is that a child regularly or from time to time shows unreasonable aggression and fierce cruelty. Aggressiveness of children and adolescents [...]

Depression, according to psychiatric statistics, is the most common disease of this direction. According to statistics, this or that type of depression, and their […]

A crisis An inferiority complex is a set of behavioral reactions that affect the self-awareness of a person, make her feel incapable of anything. […]

depression