Belonging of material spiritual values ​​to certain persons. Belonging of material and spiritual values ​​to certain persons

PROPERTY, belonging of material, spiritual values, funds to certain persons - owners; the legal right to such ownership, to own, use and dispose of the property.

As an economic category, property is the relationship between people regarding the ownership, division and redistribution of property objects. In this case, the form of ownership of the means of production (land, tools and objects of labor) is of paramount importance. The method of appropriating the means of production determines the nature of the entire set of production relations. The real content of property as an economic form of production is fixed by the legal principles of ownership, use, and disposal.

The entire history of modern civilization is the history of the development of private property, changes in its economic forms and their consolidation through legal norms.

Along with the decomposition of primitive society and the emergence of the state and family, private property also arises. Private property of the slave type means the appropriation by slave owners of not only tools of labor, but also people as a means of production. At the same time, the “sacred right” of private property was formed, which guarantees civil rights to free individuals, not slaves. Slaves act as an object of private property and, within the framework of this historical form of production, are nothing more than completely powerless “talking tools.”

Feudal private property is characterized by the assignment of the peasant to the feudal lord, who, along with the land as the main means, serves as the object of his (the feudal lord's) exploitation. Legally, these production relations take the form of serfdom.

Under capitalism, the nature and method of connecting the worker with the means of production is carried out through economic coercion through the sale of labor power by a legally free person, but deprived of any property other than labor power. Bourgeois society as a society of legally free individuals, citizens, becomes a civil society that protects the rights of everyone - as a citizen and owner.

The further evolution of private property (late 19th-20th centuries) is associated with the process of socialization of production and the emergence of new socio-economic forms on this basis. Thus, the development of cooperation and corporatization leads to the development of elements of collectivity in private property; property, while remaining private in form, gradually becomes the object of appropriation not by one subject, but by several. This is especially clearly seen in the example of joint stock companies, because the owners of shares, i.e. to a certain extent, hundreds and even thousands of individuals become owners.

Accordingly, the social structure of society is changing; the middle class (50-70% of the population), which has property in the form of real estate (house, apartment, land) and values ​​it, is becoming decisive.

The evolution of capitalist private property is also manifested in the formation and successful development of state property, which, on the one hand, serves the interests of the ruling class, the bourgeoisie, and on the other, within the framework of civil society, called upon to protect the rights of all its citizens, is increasingly socially oriented, i.e. e. aimed at protecting national interests.

OWN

Raizberg B.A., Lozovsky L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B. . Modern economic dictionary. - 2nd ed., rev. M.: INFRA-M. 479 pp. . 1999.

Economic Dictionary. 2000.

See what “PROPERY” is in other dictionaries:

own- Property... Dictionary of synonyms of the Russian language

OWN- historically defined societies. a way for people to appropriate items of productive and unproductive consumption. S. is always connected with a thing (object of appropriation), but it is not the thing itself, but the relationship between people about the thing.... ... Philosophical Encyclopedia

Own- (property) 1. Legal relationship between a particular person and a thing. 2. The object of a legal relationship with a certain person, natural or legal. Property can be private, collective or state (public). The thing may well be... Political Science. Dictionary.

OWN- PROPERTY, property, pl. no, female 1. Property in the possession, at the complete disposal of someone or something, belonging to someone or something. To have property (primarily about real estate). Lifetime property.... ... Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary

OWN- this is the spirit of the laws. Simon Nicola Lenge Property is theft. Pierre Joseph Proudhon Mine is better than ours. Benjamin Franklin Bandits value their property most. Don't they risk their freedom and even their lives for her? Georges Elgozy Every blacksmith... ... Consolidated encyclopedia of aphorisms

OWN- historically developing social relations that characterize the distribution (appropriation) of things as elements of the material wealth of society between various individuals (individuals, social groups, the state).... ... Big Encyclopedic Dictionary

Own- property or financial assets belonging to an individual or legal entity. There are state, personal, joint stock, individual, share, joint, general, labor, collective, communal, cooperative and private... ... Financial Dictionary

own- See property. Dictionary of Russian synonyms and similar expressions. under. ed. N. Abramova, M.: Russian Dictionaries, 1999. property, good, property; wealth, condition, capital, savings, funds; inventory, possession, leasehold, allod... Dictionary of synonyms

own- Ownership of the means and products of production by certain individuals or groups in certain historical conditions, reflecting a specific type of property relations. Property rights as the right of specific subjects to... ... Technical Translator's Directory

Own- (property) economic category, which, apparently, like many similar categories of a high level of abstraction, does not have a single definition. In addition, its interpretation, like the interpretation of many similar categories, depends on the political... ... Economic and mathematical dictionary

Own- (Latin proprietas, dominium; English ownership, property) 1) in a broad sense, a system of historically changing objective relations between people in the process of production, distribution, exchange, consumption, characterizing the appropriation of funds... ... Encyclopedia of Law

OWNERSHIP AND PROPERTY RIGHTS

After studying this chapter, you will know:

· definition and structure of ownership;

· theory of property rights;

· differences in the understanding of property in the legal and economic sense;

Basic concepts and terms: property, subject of ownership, object of ownership, movable property, real estate, intellectual property, property relations, possession, use, disposal, appropriation, private property, individual private property, collective private property, state property, mixed property, nationalization, privatization, denationalization , re-privatization.

The category of property has always attracted the close attention of economists. Both foreign and domestic authors devoted their works to issues of property. The relevance of this topic is explained by the fact that property determines the very system of social relations. The forms of distribution, exchange, and consumption also depend on the nature of established forms of ownership. Property plays a decisive role in determining the position of groups and classes in society, their social status and ability to access the use of goods.

Property (from the Old Russian “sobnost’” - ownership of a thing or someone) is the ownership of things, material and spiritual values ​​by certain persons, the legal right to such ownership and economic relations between people regarding ownership, division, redistribution of property objects. Property is one of the fundamental foundations of society. Therefore, any government develops legal laws regarding property.

The role, place and importance of property in the economic system are determined by the following circumstances:

firstly, property is the result of historical development and the foundation of the economic system, as it determines the purpose of production, the position of the worker in production, the form of appropriation of factors of production and material wealth;

secondly, property characterizes the economic system and the patterns of its development;

thirdly, property determines the position of various layers in society (classes);

fourthly, it fixes the property rights of individuals and legal entities.

Property is not a thing, but an attitude towards things. Property expresses the right of a subject to use an object (thing).

Property as the appropriation of material goods by people in the process of their production, exchange, distribution and consumption represents a unity of legal and economic content. In real life, they are inseparable: the economic content is protected by law, and the legal content of property receives an economic form of implementation.

For a long time, property was considered as a person’s relationship to any property, a person’s power over it. Currently under property understand the system of economic and legal relations that characterize the socio-economic and organizational forms of appropriation of property. In other words, property is a sanctioned, socially recognized relationship between people that arises in connection with the existence of goods and their use.

In relations to property there are always two sides: the subject and the object of property. When revealing the ownership structure, one should distinguish:

1) subject of ownership (owner) - the active side of the relationship, represented by a person or group of persons who own, manage and use any property. Property cannot be subjectless, “nobody’s”. She always belongs to someone. Therefore, there is no property without a subject of ownership. Subjects of appropriation may be individuals or legal entities, isolated from other legal entities or individuals as the owners of these means or results of production, their masters;

2) property - the passive side of the relationship in the form of any property owned in whole or in part by the owner. The legislation of most countries defines real estate, movable property and intellectual property as objects of property. Real estate consists of land, buildings and structures, as well as infrastructure. Movable property includes machinery, equipment, tools, durable goods (cars, furniture, etc.). Intellectual property represented by scientific and technical inventions, achievements in the field of art and literature, as well as other products of human activity.

3) property relations, which develop between people in connection with the transfer of property (appropriation or alienation of things, securities, real estate and other property) from one business entity to another, where the nature of the appropriation of the means of production used and the economic realization of property is revealed.

Subjects and objects of property are presented in Fig. 3.1.

Rice. 3.1. Subjects and objects of property

One of the most common options for interpreting property in modern conditions is property rights theory. The works of many prominent economists are devoted to its development: R. Coase, A. Alchian, D. North, R. Posner and others. This theory is based on two provisions. Firstly, the authors note that the category of property is a consequence of the fact of the rarity of resources and the possibility of their alternative use. The category of property is relevant only in light of the problem of limited resources. Property relations are a system of restricting other people’s access to rare resources or any property. The main component of property relations is appropriation, that is, the alienation of things from other people. Alienation is the deprivation of a given person of the opportunity to use certain property. In other words, one person treats certain property as his own, and all other people perceive this property as someone else's. The appropriation of property can be carried out through production, exchange, distribution, conquest, donation, treasure hunting, etc. The formation of property can go in different ways, but in any case, it is based on labor - peaceful (the work of an artisan, peasant, merchant, hired worker) or military (work of a warrior). Property turns into someone's property thanks to labor and its results cannot be ownerless.

- right of ownership - the right to exclusive physical control over a thing;

- right of use - the right to use the useful properties of a thing for oneself;

- right of management - the right to decide how, by whom and in what way the property will be used;

- the right to income - the right to have the results from the use of property;

- the right of the sovereign - the right to consume, alienate, change or destroy a good;

- the right to security - the right to protection from expropriation of property and harm from the external environment;

- the right to transfer benefits by inheritance - the owner’s right to appoint a successor to this property;

- the right to perpetual possession;

— prohibition of use in a manner harmful to the environment;

- the right to liability in the form of collection - the right to collect property in payment of a debt;

— the right to a residual nature - the right to the existence of public institutions and procedures that ensure the restoration of the violated rights of the owner.

The listed rights are sanctioned by society, its traditions, customs, legislation and determine the relationships between people that develop in connection with the existence of goods and their use.

It is important to distinguish between the concept of property in a legal and economic sense. Property as legal category determines the belonging of an object of property to its subject, owner; regulates the turnover of property, that is, the change of owner. Property as a legal category represents the relationship between people regarding the ownership, use and disposal of property, where the will of some people is the limit of the will of others. Lawyers operate with existing property; they do not consider the issue of its origin. The legal content of property includes such elements as: possession, use, disposal and appropriation (Fig. 3.2).

Rice. 3.2. Legal content of property

Property in the legal sense shows how the property ties that have developed in practice are formalized and enshrined in legal norms and laws. The right of ownership protects the owner from other persons, regulates relations arising during the formation, distribution, division of property and its joint ownership by several owners.

Legal norms include not only the right of ownership, but also the property responsibility of the owner for the safety and rational application (use) of the property. Thus, state law consolidates and protects property relations that exist in reality.

In the legal field related to property relations, rights of ownership, use, disposal, superstructure relations are formalized. They are a reflection of socio-economic, i.e. basic, relations in legal norms, rights, codes. But the legal, legal registration of property is not a passive reflection of economic property relations.

How economic category property expresses relations of appropriation. In this case, property is social-production relations between people regarding the appropriation of material goods, primarily the means of production. Economists study issues of acquiring property through production, exchange, and distribution. For economic theory, the object of property is very important, since the possession of unique property gives the owner a special social status in relation to other people who do not have such property.

The economic content of property is revealed through its functional characteristics: ownership, management and control. Moreover, the main thing is control over the production and financial activities of the subject of ownership.

In addition, the economic content of property is revealed through a person’s attitude to nature, to himself and to society (Table 3.1).

Economic content of property

Property as an economic category can exist only if there are special interdependencies between people, their social entities in connection with the appropriation (or alienation) of material conditions and results of production, gifts of nature, labor or intellectual property. After all, it is impossible to appropriate (or alienate) anything outside of social relations that establish who owns natural or labor-created goods, who disposes of them, what is the method and nature of the combination of labor power and the means of production, and how the results of production are used.

The economic understanding of property differs from the legal one. This difference is as follows.

1. Economics studies not the rights of gift and inheritance, but the process of production of material goods.

2. For the economy, the object of appropriation is more important, which determines the position of the subject in social production (owner, employee).

3. The economic position of the subject determines the nature of the connection of the worker with the means of production, since production activity and the social form of the product depend on this. As a result, the economic power of some (owners of production factors) generates the economic dependence of others (hired workers).

4. The concept of “appropriation” is the main one in the economic characteristics of property, since it means that the appropriation (acquisition) of goods by one participant presupposes the alienation (withdrawal) of this good from another. Appropriation-alienation means exchange.

5. Economic recognition of property is income, which takes various forms - wages, profits, rent, etc. - and are closely related to the property status of the owners. Receipt (appropriation) of income is associated with the appropriation of factors and results of production.

6. The economic meaning of the disposal is not in donation, sale, destruction, but in alienation-appropriation.

The main feature that distinguishes the economic nature of property from the legal one is that real appropriation is determined by the production process.

Thus, the understanding of property as the basis of the production process, which creates conditions for the appropriation of benefits and income, is the main distinguishing feature of the economic content of property from the legal one.

The economic content of property in the legal sense is fixed by legal norms of ownership, use and disposal and laws governing property relations. They determine the right of the subject of ownership to own, use and dispose of property in economic practice. Thus, property relations perform not only basic, but also superstructural functions.

Since things themselves are not property, but only owners of certain property relations, one and the same material object of property can and does represent different forms of ownership. For example, when a drill is owned by an individual and used by him to repair the dwelling in which that person lives, then it would constitute personal property. If the same drill is used for repairs for the purpose of generating income, it will turn into private property.

If the drill is used by its owner to hire labor for the purpose of making a profit, that is, acts as a means of exploitation of hired labor, then it will represent capitalist ownership of the means of production.

When a drill is purchased at the expense of the collective and is used by the members of this collective to satisfy their joint needs, then it will be collective property, if at the expense of the state - state property, if through the issue and sale of shares - joint-stock property, if it is handed over by the labor collective, for rent by the state or private - rental. The natural properties of this drill as a means of labor do not change.

Property relations include the economic realization of property for its owners, when the ultimate economic interests of the owner associated with the appropriation of certain benefits are achieved. In this case, property acts as an economic relationship, the implementation of which brings income to its owner. Indeed, property is economically realized for its owners only when it brings income to its owner from the use of the property. This can be the entire created product or part of it in the form of profit, rent, rent, interest, dividends, etc. Otherwise, property relations would not have practical significance for owners and people would not strive to become such. Consequently, the economic implementation of property relations is associated with the appropriation of income from its use. But property is not only a benefit, but also a responsibility, responsibility for its preservation and increase.

Property is a historical category. Its forms changed with changes in the forms of appropriation of things. Thus, at the dawn of human society, there was a joint, communal appropriation of the gifts of nature (hunting, fishing, etc.). As a result, communal (common) property arose, based on joint labor and joint appropriation of its results. Then the object of appropriation began to be not only the gifts of nature, but also the products of production. Private property arose, based on private labor and private appropriation of its results. It existed in two forms - labor and non-labor. The subjects of private labor property were peasants, artisans and other persons who lived by their labor (individual labor activity). Non-labor private property existed through the appropriation of the results of other people's labor (slave, feudal, capitalist).

If there is joint labor of a group of people and their joint appropriation of the results of their labor, then we are talking about collective property. If an individual or a team only temporarily disposes of someone else’s property and appropriates the results of their labor minus rent, then we are talking about a rental form of ownership.

There are many forms of ownership in economic activity. The form of ownership is the ownership of various property objects by certain owners.

The most widespread forms of ownership are: private, mixed, state (Fig. 3.3)..

Rice. 3.3. Classification of forms of ownership

Private property on factors, the production process and income involves the use of hired labor. When exercising property rights, it is possible to separate the rights of use and disposal. This means that some work, others manage income. Those who control income have economic power, and those who do not control them are economically dependent. In an intermediate position are managers (managers), since they perform the functions of management.

There are also individual and collective forms of private property.

Individual private property- labor ownership of production conditions and income. Possession, disposal and use are carried out by the owner himself (owners of personal subsidiary plots, individual traders, employees engaged in technical and industrial activities). This also includes personal ownership of consumer goods.

Collective private property based on an association of individual owners. This is group ownership of the conditions and results of production. It can be cooperative, joint stock, joint, rental, etc. Each member of collective property participates in production with his labor and property, and has equal rights in the management and disposal of income. Collective property can be shared, when the shares of each participant in the collective property are determined. Large collective property is presented in the form of joint stock.

Joint stock ownership has the following features:

- in terms of the composition of the owners, it is collective and combined at the same time. Its participants can be a variety of legal entities, including the state and foreign participants;

— joint-stock ownership creates a multiplicative effect of disposing of other people’s property and other people’s shares on a voluntary basis. The owner of a controlling block of shares actually disposes of the property of the company participants who do not own this block;

- is transitional, as it combines the features of private and public.

State- state ownership of the conditions and results of production. It differs from previous forms of ownership in that absolute property rights are not held by individuals, but by a state institution with economic and political power. The state acts as the supreme administrator of property. The entity that owns and disposes of this property is government agencies. As a result, the state receives the right to appropriate part of the income of other subjects of economic processes through taxes, duties, fees, etc. and redistribute them.

State property consists of federal, republican (property of federal subjects) and municipal.

The main managers of municipal property are local authorities. Management (disposal) of property is carried out either by the administration or by appointed managers. The income received is distributed by management independently. The same processes are characteristic of federal and republican property.

Mixed ownership is a combination of different forms of ownership. Possession, disposal and use are carried out by specially created bodies.

Thus, the listed forms of ownership do not exhaust the entire variety of existing forms and are in constant development, which is determined by the economic state of society.

In business practice, there are various types of economic systems that differ in the form of ownership, organization of labor and use of labor (Fig. 3.4).

Rice. 3.4. Types and forms of ownership

Economic relations regarding appropriation are fluid. This means that forms of ownership can change from one to another. This process is carried out using different methods. Let's look at the most important of them.

Nationalization- this is the transfer of private ownership of basic economic objects (land, industry, transport, banks) into state ownership. Nationalization has different socio-economic and political content depending on who, in whose interests and in what historical era it is carried out. The opposite process to nationalization is privatization.

Privatization(from Latin privatus - private) is the transfer of state or municipal property for a fee or free of charge into private ownership. Privatization may be hidden, for example, long-term lease of state property by private individuals or companies; may be partial, when, for example, only part of the shares are sold; can be carried out in the form of denationalization and reprivatization.

Denationalization- represents the return by the state of nationalized property to the previous owners. Currently, this process has become widespread in the Baltic countries - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania.

Re-privatization- this is the return to private ownership of state property that arose as a result of the previous purchase of enterprises, land, banks, shares, etc. from private owners. Reprivatization, unlike denationalization, as a rule, is not accompanied by acts of state power.

Privatization in Russia has an interesting history. Thus, Ivan the Terrible confiscated the estates of the disgraced boyars on a massive scale and “placed” guardsmen on them. Catherine II transferred state lands to favorites and privileged nobles. In the XVII-XVIII centuries. The state in Russia owned shipyards, mining enterprises, cloth and linen factories, most of which were subsequently privatized. In modern Russia, privatization has taken on a wide scale. Its mechanism was determined by the Law on Privatization, adopted in 1991. It laid the foundations for privatization:

1. Three forms of privatization have been defined - sale of enterprises at auction, through competition, through their corporatization.

2. Two government structures have been created - committees for the management of state (municipal) property and property funds. The functions of the former included the preparation of privatization plans and the implementation of activities related to the preparation of enterprises for privatization. The latter sold enterprises at auctions and sold their shares.

3. The objects of privatization and their monetary value were determined. Particular importance was attached to the value of property. It was decided to evaluate enterprises based on the residual value of fixed production assets. To be fair, we note that the implementation of the privatization law has strengthened social contradictions in society and therefore the law itself is subject to criticism.

Privatization is part of a broader process - the denationalization of the economy. The results of denationalization: firstly, the structure of ownership is changing in favor of private ownership and a reduction in public ownership. Secondly, the economic role and functions of the state are changing: the state ceases to be a business entity and begins to regulate economic processes not through directives, but through changes in economic living conditions; mandatory government assignments are giving way to a public procurement system; the state relieves itself of the functions of distributing available resources; The state monopoly in foreign economic activity is gradually being eliminated.

Every country has its own economic system. It consists of different components, each of which is dependent on the others.

Questions for self-control:

1. What circumstances determine the role, place and significance of property in the economic system?

2. What elements are included in the ownership structure?

3. On what principles is the theory of property rights based?

4. What are the differences in the understanding of the concept of property in the legal and economic sense?

5. What forms of ownership exist? How are they interconnected?

Pages of history

Topic 3. Economic content of property

Own (from Old Russian “sobnost’” – ownership of a thing or someone) – the ownership of things, material and spiritual values ​​by certain persons, the legal right to such ownership and economic relations between people regarding the ownership, division, redistribution of property.

Property as the appropriation of material goods by people in the process of their production, exchange, distribution and consumption is unity of legal and economic content. In real life, they are inseparable: the economic content is protected by law, and the legal content of property receives an economic form of implementation.

Legal content of property is implemented through the totality of powers of its subjects: possession, use, disposal.

These rights are closely interrelated and only together constitute the legal content of property.

Economic content of property is revealed through its functional characteristics: ownership, management And control. Moreover, the main thing is control over the production and financial activities of the subject of ownership.

In addition, the economic content of property is revealed through man's relationship to nature, to himself and to society .

Existing forms of ownership are very diverse. Here are some classifications of forms of ownership.

A modern market economy presupposes the existence of various forms of ownership, including state ownership , collective, group, individual and many mixed forms, such as, for example, collective-private or state-collective etc. A modern market economy is an economy with mixed ownership, both in the sense of the existence of different forms of ownership and in the sense of the formation of mixed forms. According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, private property is equally recognized and protected in the Russian Federation. , state, municipal and other forms of ownership.

In different countries and in different historical periods, the specific ratio of private and state property may change - the state can carry out nationalization(Latin natio - people) property, i.e. the transfer of property from private hands to the hands of the state, and privatization(Latin privatus - private) property, i.e. transfer of state property to individual citizens or legal entities created by them.

Sample assignment

B2. Below is a list of terms. All of them, with the exception of one, are associated with the concept of “property”.

Possession; rent; order; property; promotion; use.

Find and indicate a term that is not related to the concept of “property”.

Answer: Promotion.

He is considered one of the founders of Muslim political, legal and economic thought. His numerous works (“Civil Politics”, “Aphorisms of a Statesman”, “On the Classification of Sciences”, etc.) had a great influence on the development of Eastern thought, including the worldview of Ibn Sina, Nizami, Ibn Khaldun.

The essence of Al-Farabi's ideal state lies in the freedom and equality of all its inhabitants. According to Al-Farabi, property is one of the benefits that constitute freedom. But the thinker draws a line between property as a means of achieving higher values ​​and property as an end in itself in life. The latter is vicious, which is why Al-Farabi calls the city, opposed to the virtuous one, ignorant, lost, and also “a city of exchange.”

Al-Farabi notes that every resident should have their own home and the ability to satisfy their needs. Unlike Muslim philosophers, Al-Farabi believed that in an ideal state a foreigner does not stand out from the local population and has the right to acquire property.

The main work of Ibn Khaldun, which made him famous, is “The Great History”, or “The Book of Instructive Examples and Diwan of Messages about the Days of the Arabs, Persians and Berbers and their Contemporaries, Who Possessed Power of Great Dimensions” (another translation of the title is “The Book of Edifications” ). The fifth section of Ibn Khaldun’s “Great History” is devoted to issues of property.

In his opinion, the basis for acquiring the right to any property is labor. Labor in the direct production of products and fruits entails the conversion of a thing into the property of the one who created it - this is a direct result of labor. When the right of ownership arises from a transaction, its background is also labor, since “without it, accumulated property does not arise and it will not be possible to use it.”

Ibn Khaldun warned that with the further “development of the world,” the state’s demands increase, and then the shares of taxes on the property of subjects multiply. He considered it fair to establish zakat - a voluntary donation of property - and kharaj - a tax on privately owned lands, if it is collected in a reasonable amount, the border of which cannot be crossed

Unlike most Muslim thinkers, Ibn Khaldun assigned property a key place in social relations; It is the development of property, in his opinion, that pushes civilization forward and causes the emergence of qualitatively new forms of human society.

OWN

OWN

the ownership of things, material and spiritual values ​​by certain persons, the legal right to such ownership and economic relations between people regarding the ownership, division, redistribution of property.

Raizberg B.A., Lozovsky L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B.. Modern economic dictionary. - 2nd ed., rev. M.: INFRA-M. 479 pp.. 1999 .

Economic dictionary. 2000 .

Synonyms:

See what “PROPERY” is in other dictionaries:

own- Property... Dictionary of Russian synonyms

Historically defined societies. a way for people to appropriate items of productive and unproductive consumption. S. is always connected with a thing (object of appropriation), but it is not the thing itself, but the relationship between people regarding the thing.... ... Philosophical Encyclopedia

- (property) 1. Legal relationship between a particular person and a thing. 2. The object of a legal relationship with a certain person, natural or legal. Property can be private, collective or state (public). The thing may well be... Political science. Dictionary.

PROPERTY, property, many. no, female 1. Property in the possession, at the complete disposal of someone or something, belonging to someone or something. To have property (primarily about real estate). Lifetime ownership... ... Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary

This is the spirit of the laws. Simon Nicola Lenge Property is theft. Pierre Joseph Proudhon Mine is better than ours. Benjamin Franklin Bandits value their property most. Don't they risk their freedom and even their lives for her? Georges Elgozy Every blacksmith... ... Consolidated encyclopedia of aphorisms

Historically developing social relations that characterize the distribution (appropriation) of things as elements of the material wealth of society between various persons (individuals, social groups, the state).... ... Big Encyclopedic Dictionary

Property or financial assets owned by an individual or legal entity. There are state, personal, joint stock, individual, share, joint, general, labor, collective, communal, cooperative and private... ... Financial Dictionary

See property... Dictionary of Russian synonyms and similar expressions. under. ed. N. Abramova, M.: Russian Dictionaries, 1999. property, good, property; wealth, condition, capital, savings, funds; inventory, possession, leasehold, allod... Synonym dictionary

own- Ownership of the means and products of production by certain individuals or groups in certain historical conditions, reflecting a specific type of property relations. Property rights as the right of specific subjects to... ... Technical Translator's Guide

Own- (property) economic category, which, apparently, like many similar categories of a high level of abstraction, does not have a single definition. In addition, its interpretation, like the interpretation of many similar categories, depends on the political... ... Economic-mathematical dictionary

Own- (Latin proprietas, dominium; English ownership, property) 1) in a broad sense, a system of historically changing objective relations between people in the process of production, distribution, exchange, consumption, characterizing the appropriation of funds... ... Encyclopedia of Law

Books

• Property, V.V. Bibikhin. For the first time, a course of lectures given by Vladimir Bibikhin at the Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow State University in 1993 and in the spring semester of 1994 is published. Attention is drawn to the hidden polarity of his,…
• Property and property rights: civil aspects: Monograph/Yu. N. Andreev-M.:Jur. Norma, Scientific Research Center, Andreev Yu. N.. Property and property rights: civil aspects: Monograph/Yu. N. Andreev-M.:Jur. Norma, Research Center...

In the modern world, material wealth often comes to the fore, while people completely forget about the spiritual side. So what is more important? What are the material and spiritual

Concept and examples of material assets

Our society is currently structured in such a way that a person cannot exist without a set of certain things, objects that make his life easier and more comfortable. Thus, the origins of material values ​​lie in the need for people to satisfy their needs.

Material values ​​are a collection of objects, money, property, the significance of which for a person is very great. Examples of such valuables are real estate, cars, gold jewelry, furs, furniture, appliances and equipment.

Some are more, some are less, dependent on material wealth. Some people cannot imagine their existence without expensive things, others limit themselves to only the essentials. However, one way or another, material values ​​occupy a significant place in people's lives.

Basic spiritual values ​​of a person

Spiritual values ​​are a set of moral, religious, and beliefs of a person that are significant to him. They are formed from birth, change and improve over time. Formulate the main differences between spiritual values ​​and material ones in order to understand how important they are in our lives.

Spiritual values ​​include love, friendship, sympathy, respect, self-realization, creativity, freedom, faith in oneself and in God. All this helps us find harmony with ourselves and the people around us. These values ​​are of particular importance, give meaning to life and make us human.

What to answer if they ask: “Formulate the main differences between spiritual values ​​and material ones”?

Based on the concepts and examples of spiritual and material values, we can conclude that their similarity lies in their significance and importance for humans. Both of them make our existence without them flawed and meaningless.

So, you were asked: “Formulate the main differences between spiritual values ​​and material ones.” What will you answer? The answer comes down to the fact that the first of them cannot be seen or touched. However, this is not the most important difference.

First of all, like any benefits, they are limited. Contrary to people's wishes, they cannot be available to each of us. Spiritual values ​​are universal. Their number is infinite and does not depend on the number of people who have them. Spiritual values ​​can become the property of every person, regardless of his financial situation and other factors that are an obstacle to obtaining material values.

What values ​​are more important for a person?

Someone will say that under no circumstances should one elevate material wealth above relationships with loved ones and one’s own conscience. For other people there are no prohibitions or boundaries on the path to wealth and fame. Which of them is right and what is more important for a person?

The material and spiritual values ​​of culture are closely interconnected. People will not feel comfortable having only one of these. For example, many businessmen who have earned a huge fortune often feel unhappy because they have not been able to find harmony with their soul. At the same time, a person with a rich inner world will not feel good if he loses his home or livelihood.

Thus, if someone asks you: “Formulate the main differences between spiritual values ​​and material ones and explain which of them is more important for a person,” say that this cannot be answered unambiguously. Everyone sets their own priorities.

The mistake of some people is the desire to take possession of as much wealth as possible at any cost. At the same time, in pursuit of money, they neglect friendship, honesty, and warm relationships with their loved ones. It is also a wrong approach when people, living in poverty, do not make any efforts to improve their lives. They believe that the main thing for them is a rich inner world, and everything else is completely unimportant. Ideally, one should try to find the right balance between spiritual and material values.

Page 18 of 36

Economic and legal content of property.

In addition to the triune question “What - how - for whom to produce?” there is another important economic question: “Who has economic power?” In other words, on whose means of production will production be carried out, who will own the goods?

The problem of property is one of the most debated in economic theory and socially acute in the life of society. Property -economic connections between people, and jurisprudence - legal relations. As a result, one word “property” denotes, although close, but not identical concepts. This is the ownership of material, spiritual values, and funds to certain individual owners. In the literature one can find a wide variety of interpretations of property. This concept is studied from different angles by several social sciences. Thus, economics reveals in the appropriation of useful goods

A comprehensive study of property allows us to clarify three main socio-economic issues:

1. Who(which economic entities) have economic power, appropriate factors and results of production?

2. What economic ties contribute to better use of resources?

3. To whom receive income from business activities?

In accordance with this, a unified system of economic property relations can be represented in the form of a diagram that includes three elements (Fig. 10).

Rice. 10.Structure of the system of property relations

For an economist, property is not a thing, not a person’s relationship to a thing, but relationship between people regarding the appropriation of goods(material and intangible). Thus, the starting point for the study economic content of property is the definition of the concept of “appropriation”.

Under assignment refers to the possibility of using a certain good in production and consumption exclusively by a given subject of economic relations. The Austrian economist Carl Menger (1840?1921) came to the conclusion that property has as its initial premise the existence rare goods, i.e. those goods, the quantity of which is less compared to the need for them. Therefore, the institution of property is the only possible tool for solving the problem of “the disproportion between the need and the amount of goods available for disposal”1.

Property relations allow for the possibility of transfer of an object (means) of labor into the ownership of one person (appropriation) and its alienation from another. Alienation? depriving a subject of the opportunity to use a given benefit in production and consumption. In meaning, it is directly opposite to the concept of “appropriation”.

The central point of property relations is their exclusionary character . Property relations are a system of exclusions from access to material and intangible resources for everyone except the owner himself. The absence of exceptions, i.e. free access to them, means that they belong to no one, that they belong to no one or, in other words, belong to everyone. Such resources and benefits cannot constitute an object of property. Consequently, regarding their use, people do not enter into economic relations of market exchange.

Consequently, property relations are, first of all, relations of appropriation and alienation. Between them there is a hidden system of relations of use and disposal. The relationship of use allows the use of means or objects of labor with a certain benefit. Disposition relations make it possible to manage the process of using property. Hired worker in the production process uses equipment owned by another person. Manager of a large company disposes, manages property without being its owner. The owner of the factors of production does not always act as a direct economic entity, an entrepreneur.

In the process of economic activity, property is economically being implemented, i.e. brings income . The owner of a piece of land can work on this land himself and receive income, or he can rent it out or mortgage it to a mortgage bank, but in any case he will receive the corresponding income. Thus, the economic realization of property is carried out through certain types of economic activities.

Property in the economic sense – This is the relationship between people regarding ownership, division and redistribution of property.

Property is a product of the historical development of society and, first of all, the economic life of people. Property characterizes an individual’s attitude to the world of things around him as “to his own” or as “to others.” Such an attitude can be formed on the basis of established morality, traditions, norms, rules, laws adopted in a given society. Therefore, property is considered, first of all, as a legal category, and therefore lawyers quite rightly speak not about property in general, but about property rights (private, state, etc.). "There is property right, that is, a specially established method of recognition for certain persons possibilities disposition, dominion over things and protection of this possibility from encroachment by third parties.”1

Property in legal terms – the legal right to the ownership of material and spiritual values, funds to their owners, the right to own, use and dispose of the property. These rights are enshrined in legal norms.

Thus, when talking about property, it is important to distinguish right With property And property relations .

Property rights are the right to control the use of certain resources and to distribute the resulting costs and benefits. Property rights form the “lion’s share” of the rules that regulate most social relations, delimit what belongs to whom, how the change of ownership will occur, and determine the degree of freedom of choice of people pursuing their interests.

The right of ownership expresses the attitude towards a thing “as one’s own” or “as someone else’s”, i.e. is built according to the formula:

However, this interpretation does not answer the question: “Where does property rights come from and how is it implemented?” The answer lies in considering property as an economic relationship between people regarding things, which can be expressed by the formula:

If we try to dissect the economic relations of property, we will immediately discover two sides: the subject (owner) and the object (property).

Object property may be: real estate (apartment, house, plot of land, etc.); movable property (car, yacht, equipment, furniture, etc.); as well as intellectual property (inventions, software products, manuscripts, achievements in art and other products of human intelligence).

Property subjects individuals, their associations, social groups and society as a whole can act as individuals who appropriate certain benefits.

It is quite obvious that the entire system of property relations gives rise to economic - material, property - interests in people. The main one, probably, is to multiply in every possible way the goods owned in order to better satisfy needs. Thus, through interests, property determines the direction and nature of people’s economic behavior.

However, a person driven by proprietary interests can come into conflict with the interests of the entire society. In this case, only the state and law can regulate the behavior of economic entities and prevent contradictions.