The population has developed a persistent stereotype that official medicine, with all its dogmas and foundations, is not always safe. In this wave, people, in particular, began to avoid vaccinations and protect their children from them. What is the truth here, and what is the misconception? Igor Obrubov, an infectious disease specialist and epidemiologist of the highest category, answers this question.

- Today, many people refuse vaccinations, including routine children’s vaccinations. Why do you think?

Because in recent years, some media, as well as all kinds of healers and pseudo-healers, have been actively promoting the refusal of vaccinations, citing the enormous harm and even mortal danger that vaccination allegedly poses. Such propaganda led to mass tragedy when, due to an outbreak of diphtheria in the mid-1990s. Thousands of people died in Russia. Of course, complications from vaccinations sometimes occur, but the risks that occur during vaccination are minimal. It must be admitted that children do sometimes die after vaccinations, but most often this is a coincidence in time when there is another cause of death, and can also be associated with the blatant negligence of doctors.

- Which parents are at greater risk: those who categorically reject routine vaccinations for their children, or those who agree to them?

- A democratic society assumes that consent is required for vaccination. However, one must always understand that refusing it is fraught with fatal consequences. Thanks to vaccinations, the incidence of diphtheria, measles, mumps, and rubella has decreased significantly, and polio has been practically eliminated. But these diseases are not as harmless as they seem; many cause serious complications and often end tragically. Refusal of routine vaccinations, such as DTP (a combination drug used to develop immunity against dangerous infections such as diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough), polio vaccine (for the immunization of polio), trivaccines (measles-rubella-mumps), etc. , may result in disability or even death.

- And if the disease is practically eradicated, why continue to vaccinate, because this is still a burden on the immune system? For example, smallpox vaccinations have been abandoned for a long time...

Now polio is on the verge of destruction. However, vaccination against it continues. And here's the reason. Poliomyelitis is a highly infectious viral disease that mainly affects young children. The virus is transmitted through contaminated food and water, multiplies in the intestines and from there can penetrate the nervous system. Many infected people have no symptoms but shed the virus in their feces and can thus transmit the infection to others.

As recently as 1988, more than 350,000 cases of polio were identified worldwide. In 2011, the number of reported cases was 650. Currently, three countries remain endemic for polio: Nigeria, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Since 2002, the Russian Federation, as part of the WHO European Region, has been certified as a polio-free territory. However, cases of infection “from outside” continue to occur. The last “imported” case was registered quite recently - in September 2010.

The World Health Organization has set the goal of completely eradicating polio, as happened with smallpox. Despite the progress made since 1988, as long as there is at least one child in the world infected with poliovirus, the risk of infection among children in other countries remains. Poliovirus can easily enter a country without polio and spread rapidly among unimmunized populations.

- How does polio manifest itself?

It mainly affects children under the age of five. Early symptoms of polio include fever, fatigue, headache, vomiting, neck stiffness and pain in the extremities. In a small proportion of cases, the disease causes paralysis. In one in 200 cases, the paralysis is irreversible (usually of the legs). Of those paralyzed, 5%-10% die as a result of paralysis of the respiratory muscles.
Polio cannot be cured, it can only be prevented. The polio vaccine, given repeatedly, can protect a child from the disease for life.

- Is there a risk of getting polio after vaccination?

There are two vaccines in the world for the specific prevention of polio: the killed Salk vaccine and the live (attenuated) Sebin vaccine. The main advantage of the killed vaccine is its safety. It is administered parenterally (by injection) and produces only general immunity. Consequently, a person vaccinated with this vaccine does not get sick himself, but for others he can be a source of infection.

Sebin's live vaccine is highly immunogenic; it is administered orally and provides general and local protection, which is its important advantage. However, it can cause vaccine-associated polio.

In order to prevent the occurrence of cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio, an inactivated polio vaccine has been developed and introduced in Russia. When immunizing healthy children against polio, inactivated polio vaccine and oral polio vaccine are used in accordance with the schemes of the National Preventive Vaccination Calendar.

If previously the entire population was required to be vaccinated, in recent years a fashion has arisen to refuse vaccinations, which are not given to children without parental consent. Accordingly, parents themselves can specifically write a refusal, fearing complications.

However, we must keep in mind that the unexpected return of infections occurs for one reason: we are already accustomed to not having them. And since they are not there, then let’s skip the vaccination - we can do without it, we won’t get sick anyway. This approach is fundamentally wrong: you can cancel the vaccination, but no one has canceled the infection. She can return at any moment, just as it is quite logical, given this attitude, that polio can now return to Russia.
The following examples indicate how serious the situation is with infectious diseases that seem to be a thing of the past: it is impossible to calculate how many children die from polio in India, Nigeria, and Afghanistan: they are usually buried there on the day of death without finding out the cause. And in Tajikistan they only realized it because the number of cases turned out to be high. In this country, as well as in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, there has been a vaccination culture since Soviet times, but due to economic reasons, vaccines are supplied through UNICEF.

- Is it true that after smallpox was eradicated, it suddenly broke out somewhere?

Not true. The last case of smallpox was reported in the world in Somalia in 1977. Smallpox is the first and so far the only infectious disease completely defeated through mass vaccination. Vaccinations against smallpox in the USSR stopped in 1978-1982. Currently, the variola virus exists only in two laboratories in the United States and Russia. The question of the final destruction of the smallpox virus has been postponed until 2014.

- How to avoid the risk of vaccinations?

There are no lethal or dangerous vaccinations. Killed or weakened forms of bacteria and viruses or toxoid are used as vaccination strains. These bacteria do not cause diseases, but only form immunity. All vaccines have certain contraindications. Vaccination of both children and adults should be carried out, taking into account contraindications, only after examination by a doctor.

- What vaccinations do you recommend for everyone?

- In addition to vaccinations included in the national calendar, there is also vaccination for epidemic indications. For example, in the flooded Krymsk the population was vaccinated against viral hepatitis A, the threat of which existed at that time.

It is imperative to be immunized against tetanus, in which individual immunity is formed, and in the event of injuries from which no one is immune, an unvaccinated person may develop a disease that in 100% of cases ends in death. If you are bitten by an animal, you must be vaccinated against rabies, since refusal to vaccinate can also lead to death.

- Now, on the eve of the epidemic season, the issue of vaccination against influenza is relevant. But not everyone believes in it. What can you say about this?

In my practice, not a single death from influenza has been registered in a vaccinated person, although in recent years, with the emergence of a highly pathogenic influenza virus, deaths from complications of influenza, mainly pneumonia, have become more frequent. Flu vaccinations do not always protect against the disease, but they significantly improve the course of the disease and help prevent complications.

interviewed by Elena Serebryakova

As we told you, on October 9 in Kaluga as a result of bilateral pneumonia. His mother Larisa Barinova wrote about the tragedy on social networks. The woman believes that her son fell ill with pneumonia due to the DTP vaccination, which was given to the boy 6 days before his death, on October 3.

“My 8-month-old child died after a routine DPT vaccination! Parents!!! Think 100 times before giving your child any vaccinations, read information about them and their consequences, about those affected by them. And don't think that this won't affect you. “I thought so too,” Larisa wrote on her page on the VKontakte social network. – Moreover, they are vaccinated against diseases that are not epidemically dangerous, but are transmitted through blood. Before vaccination, the examination is done almost by eye. They do not take any tests: neither blood nor urine, which could show whether there are complications from the subsequent vaccination. Some complications overlap with others. And there are many such cases when, after vaccination, a child either died or remained disabled for life. Information about all this is kept silent - it means money is involved and someone benefits from it!”

Larisa Barinova says that at the time of vaccination the baby was absolutely healthy. He tolerated the previous two DPT vaccinations well. By the evening of October 3, the boy’s temperature rose and snot appeared, but by the morning of the next day, Rostislav’s condition, according to his mother, returned to normal.

It worsened again on the night of October 9: the boy vomited. Larisa Barinova decided that this was due to complementary feeding: the day before she fed her son more broccoli puree than usual.

On the morning of the 9th, when the woman realized that her child’s condition was deteriorating, she turned to doctors for help. It was not possible to save the baby. The Ministry of Health of the Kaluga Region and the Investigative Committee are currently conducting an investigation into this fact.

The Internet public, meanwhile, has already drawn its own conclusions. Many social network users, like Larisa Barinova, believe that the cause of the child’s death was the DTP vaccine. We decided to find out how justified these suspicions are.

Agreed to comment on the situation famous Russian pediatrician Sergei BUTRY. He lives and works in Ivanovo, and on his pages on the social networks Facebook and VKontakte he covers in detail topics that are relevant to parents: vaccinations, vitamins, treatment of colds, etc.

Despite his busy work schedule: Sergei Butriy works 11 hours a day, he found time to give a detailed commentary on the tragedy that happened in Kaluga, as well as on whether the DTP vaccine is as scary as vaccine opponents make it out to be. Sergei Butriy accompanied each of his arguments with a link to primary sources.

The DPT vaccination could not directly or indirectly provoke pneumonia, says Sergei Butriy. – DTP – a vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis component – ​​is perhaps the most reactogenic vaccine in the entire national vaccination calendar, that is, it most often causes undesirable effects: local (redness, pain and swelling of the injection site) and systemic (fever, malaise, sometimes even febrile seizures).

Because of this, parents are more wary of the DPT vaccine than any other, and because of this, the DPT vaccine has been the subject of an incredible amount of research into its safety. The vaccine was suspected of a variety of “sins”: that it provokes sudden infant death syndrome, persistent encephalopathy, epilepsy, dementia, etc. All reasonable suspicions that concerned only lesions of the central nervous system were carefully studied in rigorous studies, and the cause-and-effect relationship was refuted. Millions of dollars and pounds were spent on this, after which the vaccine was rehabilitated and these suspicions were removed from it.

So, even the most aggressive critics of this vaccine never suspected that it could cause pneumonia. There is not a single scientific evidence of such a connection. Neither the official instructions for the DTP vaccine, nor the most detailed professional analyzes of its adverse reactions anywhere, even in half a word, mention the possibility of causing pneumonia. Therefore, we must recognize that the tragedy that occurred cannot be related to the introduction of the vaccine.

- How complex (so to speak) is DPT? Is it easy for children to tolerate? Are there any contraindications for this vaccination? Is the local doctor required to prescribe urine or blood tests before vaccination to make sure that the child is healthy? How should a child be examined immediately before vaccination?

I have already said that unwanted reactions (not to be confused with complications) to the DTP vaccine occur quite often. For example, an increase in temperature above 38°C on the third dose of DPT occurs in almost every second child (see. directory Immunoprophylaxis 2014, p. 79). However, these undesirable effects are not too high a price to pay for protecting a child from tetanus, whooping cough and diphtheria. Of course, there are contraindications for the DTP vaccine. These are primarily severe and progressive neurological disorders, afebrile seizures, acute infectious diseases and exacerbations of chronic diseases, etc. (see details). As far as I know about the tragedy in Kaluga from open sources, the doctor examined the child and excluded these contraindications, which means he not only had the right, but also had to administer the vaccine. No regulatory document in the Russian Federation obliges a doctor to monitor blood and urine tests before vaccination in order to prevent complications from it, and this is correct. Because these complications are completely impossible to predict from tests or anything else. The current practice of prescribing tests for each child before each vaccination has no scientific basis and can only serve as some irrational way to reassure parents who are afraid of vaccination.

The examination of the child before vaccination is carried out like any other examination by a pediatrician, and if no obvious diseases are detected, according to the law of the Russian Federation, the doctor not only can, but must also vaccinate the child. More and more evidence is accumulating around the world that vaccinating sick children does not carry with it either an increased risk of complications from vaccination or an increased risk of complications from the disease itself (for example, see), but these recommendations have not yet reached Russia. In our country, even a minor ARVI is a contraindication to vaccinating a child. And even these overly cautious rules, as far as I know, were followed by the pediatrician.

- In your opinion, what is the degree of guilt in the incident of the local pediatrician who gave the go-ahead for the vaccination?

Considering everything I said above – none. A pediatrician is not a psychic; he cannot predict the future. He acted in the interests of the child, because he wanted to protect him from three very serious infections, the epidemiological situation for which in the Russian Federation is still unfavorable. He had no reason to expect complications from the vaccine - especially since this child had already been given the same DTP vaccine twice, and, according to the mother, it was well tolerated. And, I emphasize, the pediatrician turned out to be right: no complications developed from the vaccine. Pneumonia cannot in any way be considered a complication of DTP, because such complications with this vaccine have not been described in principle and because complications develop in the first hours or 2-3 days from the administration of the vaccine, and not on the sixth day.

If a child died in an accident after receiving DTP vaccination, would this be a complication? What if he fell out of the window? You understand that there is no connection between falling from a window and DTP, even if it happened immediately after vaccination? It’s the same with pneumonia and death from it. Yes, this is a terrible tragedy, and I sincerely - as a doctor and as a father of two children - sympathize with this family. But the fact that the vaccination took place the day before is purely an accident, and the accusations against the local pediatrician and the vaccine are groundless, irrational and unfair.

Judging by the mother's description, which she posted for public discussion, the child suffered aspiration of vomit, which caused aspiration pneumonia, respiratory failure and the death of the child. In my opinion, this is not the fault of the mother, the pediatrician, or the vaccine.

- Some parents, after the tragedy, are worried that their children may also become victims of vaccination. How justified are these fears? Can parents do anything to ensure that vaccination does not have any negative consequences for the child?

Any negative event after vaccination, whether related or unrelated to it, always immediately comes under the closest public attention. This provokes a wave of publications in the media and social networks, mass refusals of vaccinations and sweeping accusations towards doctors and vaccine manufacturers. At the same time, cases when a child was not vaccinated on time and he fell ill, for example, with whooping cough, are discussed a couple of orders of magnitude more modestly and less frequently. Why do you think this happens? Because parents feel guilty and try to shut up and forget this incident. This imbalance in public awareness is what gives rise to anti-vaccination sentiments. On the one hand, there are regular messages on social networks about tragedies that coincided with vaccination (like the case under discussion), or true adverse reactions to the vaccine, on the other hand, there is silence about the consequences of refusal to vaccinate. This is unfair and dangerous. People should be told how many vaccine-preventable infections there are in the Russian Federation, how many children suffer and die from them. It is worth at least as wide coverage of cases of child death from tetanus, pertussis pneumonia, measles, pneumococcal meningitis, and so on - that is, from those infections that vaccinations protect against. So that parents are aware of the arguments on both sides.

The bad news is that the risk of adverse events and complications from vaccinations cannot be reduced in advance. Postponing vaccination to a later date not only increases the time that a child will be defenseless against vaccine-preventable diseases, but, according to some studies, even worsens the tolerability of vaccination.

No matter how cynical it may sound, tragedies have always happened to children, and, unfortunately, will continue to happen. Some of these tragedies will continue to occur after vaccination, simply because children are vaccinated frequently and the risk of coincidences is quite high.

In his book Deadly Choices, pediatrician Paul Offit cites a case in which a father once brought his child to the family doctor for vaccination, waited in the waiting room for more than an hour and went home, upset by the long line. At home, he put the child to bed, and a few hours later he found him dead in his crib. An autopsy showed that the child died from sudden infant death syndrome. This father later said that if the pediatrician had administered the vaccine to his child, not a single study in the world would have been able to convince him that the vaccine killed the child.

Anyone who works with children, especially a local pediatrician, is at great risk. Anything bad that happens to a child can be blamed on the pediatrician: both by the public and by the imperfect judicial system. But if this is the price for working in pediatrics, who would want to work in pediatrics anyway?

By unfair persecution, you harass doctors, provoke their burnout, and push them to leave the profession and do something much safer and more profitable. And those who remain in the profession begin to constantly play it safe, since unjustified medical exemptions from vaccinations do not lead to sanctions against the doctor, but an administered vaccine always does

Medical scandal in Odessa. A day after vaccination, a two-year-old child died in intensive care. Parents are sure that the injection is to blame for everything. In turn, doctors assure that the vaccination had nothing to do with it - the boy died from a dangerous infection.

The mother of the deceased child says that on Friday the boy received a routine injection, the so-called DPT vaccine, and less than 24 hours later, on Saturday, the baby was gone.

Marina Gorilchanaya, mother of the child: The resuscitator came down and said - we couldn’t save the child. His lungs failed. They immediately connected him to the machine, but his heart could not stand it, and the child died.

Daniel’s grandmother claims that before vaccination the child felt excellent and did not get sick. The woman is sure that the administered drug is directly or indirectly responsible for the death of her grandson.

Elena Gorilchanaya, the child’s grandmother: cheerful, healthy. At the age of two, he went to the clinic with his own legs. On his way to the clinic, he said hello to his neighbor.

In the Odessa Infectious Diseases Hospital, where Daniil died, after a preliminary study they say that the vaccination could not have caused the death of the child. Most likely, the boy contracted a particularly dangerous form of meningitis.

Svetlana Lavryukova, head physician of the Odessa City Infectious Diseases Hospital: There is a so-called fulminant form of meningococcal infection, which occurs within a few hours. Within 24 hours, it most often ends, unfortunately, in death. Meningococcal infection can be compared to a fire in the steppe - everything develops very quickly, instantly. Like a fire in the steppe.

An investigation into this fact is currently underway, its results should become known in the coming days.

Vyacheslav Polyasny, Deputy Head of the Odessa City Health Department: Our commission conducted an investigation at the clinic. Within two days, a commission is created in the Regional Health Department - those activities that are regulated by order of the Ministry of Health. Then the report is submitted to the Ministry of Health, and there a decision is made on how to proceed in this situation.

Until the circumstances of the tragedy were clarified, the vaccine that was given to the child was completely withdrawn from the city hospitals.

The Ministry of Health has officially decided that the death of a two-year-old boy in Odessa after vaccination was in no way connected with the introduction of the vaccine. However, mass refusal of vaccinations is now possible in Odessa. At least, in similar circumstances several years ago, parents in Kramatorsk and Donetsk behaved this way.
We have not found objective and reliable studies on the consequences of vaccinations in domestic sources, but the problem of vaccination is global, so let’s turn to foreign sources.

The study, “Worsening infant mortality rates with increasing number of vaccine doses administered: is the relationship biochemical or synergistic?”, published in May 2011 in the international medical scientific journal Human & Experimental Toxicology, showed a statistically significant correlation between infant mortality rates and vaccination rates.

Somewhat detracts from the credibility of this study is that one of its authors, Neil Miller, is a social activist and anti-vaccination activist. This is a media character and a frequent guest on all sorts of American talk shows on the topic of vaccination, that is, a person by definition is biased. However, the eye-catching design of his website shows that Neil Miller has no money, that is, he does not use sponsorship from any corporations. Moreover, Human & Experimental Toxicology itself is a respected enough source to listen to.

The authors of the study tried to find an answer to the question: why does the United States, which spends more money on health care in both relative and absolute terms than any other country in the world, have far from the best infant mortality index? IMI is one of the key indicators for assessing living standards; it is the number of infant deaths per thousand children born alive. In the USA, the IMI is 6.8 (34th place in the world ranking), which is twice as high as in Singapore, Sweden and Japan.

The levels of IMI in the top thirty countries were compared with the number of doses of various vaccines administered to children in the first year of life, and a statistically significant relationship was found between them. In the USA, a baby receives 26 different mandatory vaccinations, and in Sweden and Japan - 12, in Singapore - 17. As a result, the correlation coefficient was 0.70, and according to the research methodology, a correlation >0.0009 would be considered statistically significant. That is, the more children are fed vaccines, the more often they die.

The infant mortality index is highly dependent on the standard of living in general, but the countries compared in the study, with some exceptions, do not differ much in standard of living. If such a study were carried out on a global scale, countries would have to be separately divided into groups depending on their level of development. Some very interesting things could come to light.

For example, Ukraine has IMS 9.0, despite the fact that our children receive only 8 vaccinations in the first year of life. In Mongolia, which is comparable to us in terms of living standards, each baby is vaccinated 22 times in the first year, and the IMR there is several times higher than in Ukraine - 39.9. And one of the poorest countries in the world - The Gambia - with the same 22 vaccinations has a catastrophic IMI - 68.9. That is, every fifteenth baby dies there, while, “thanks to” international assistance, more than 95 percent of children in The Gambia are vaccinated.

The study's authors doubt that vaccines kill children directly. It’s just that each vaccination is an extraordinary stress for the body, which puts a significant burden on the immune system. Accumulating over and over again, these stresses reduce the overall defense of the body.

Refusing to vaccinate your children is stupid. If only because, for example, children vaccinated against polio for some time after vaccination become carriers of a weakened virus and pose a danger to unvaccinated children. That is, if you do not vaccinate your child, he can become infected from those who are vaccinated. But increasing the number of vaccinations beyond what is officially required is hardly reasonable. And those that are required must be done consciously, be sure to check with your pediatrician about the origin of the vaccine. The decision to give a child a vaccine is legally up to the parent - you should not let doctors decide for you.

In Russia, mortality from vaccinations was particularly high in 2009.

In 2009, a wave of child deaths from vaccinations swept across Russia - ordinary vaccinations that are mandatory for all children. Parents sounded the alarm, and doctors reassured them, saying that these were all tragic coincidences, and without vaccines it would be even worse.

Channel Five correspondent Stanislav Grigoriev I tried to understand the situation and found out: what our children are vaccinated with has long been recognized throughout the world as deadly.

These are the toys of eight-month-old Liza Dyakova. Mom doesn't put them in the closet. She seems to hope that the girl will somehow miraculously return. But Lisa had already died, in terrible agony.

The day before his death, the child was vaccinated. They introduced the so-called DTP - a combined vaccine against diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus. Within a few hours, Lisa’s temperature rose to 39.2. Mom called an ambulance.

“They looked at her, listened to her, looked at her neck, and said that she had ARVI. We said that we were vaccinated, they said that the vaccination had nothing to do with it. We left without lowering the temperature, not an injection, nothing. They just left."

And a few hours later the temperature rose even higher. The girl began to lose consciousness and became covered in some strange rash. The ambulance arrived for the second time.

Anastasia Dyakova, mother of Elizaveta Dyakova:“They told us we were going to the hospital.”

From this moment until death, another five hours passed, no more. In the afternoon, the parents were told: your girl is no more, the pathologist will determine the reason. And a month later, in her mother’s arms, there was an official document that said Lisa died of meningitis. Vaccination has nothing to do with it.

Tatyana Ombeleva, deputy chief physician of children's clinic No. 44:“The doctor had no way to predict such a development. This child had no contraindications to vaccinations; he was admitted at a normal temperature and in normal condition.”
In addition, according to doctors, the girl’s congenital diseases also contributed to her death. But mom doesn't believe it.

Anastasia Dyakova, mother of Elizaveta Dyakova:“I can’t wrap my head around it. If a child develops incorrectly, how can he grow up like a normal healthy child?”

Lisa grew and developed to the envy of other children. Is it really possible for such a coincidence: to get meningitis on the day of vaccination? Recent cases in other regions raise suspicions.

In Kaliningrad, a three-month-old girl died after a similar vaccination. The Investigative Committee is now studying the circumstances of her death. And in Chelyabinsk, parents began to notice that after vaccinations their children’s arms and legs were swelling and their temperature was rising. Everyone is guilty of the same DTP. At the same time, doctors convince: there is no need to be afraid, because if you do not get vaccinated, it could be even worse.

However, parents still have the right to refuse vaccination. It is possible that some will now do so. Especially if they carefully read publications about DPT on the Internet. Here is a website dedicated to this vaccine. The authors argue that it does more harm than good. And to prove their words they cite documents dating back to Soviet times. One, especially interesting one, states that the production of some components of the drug is strictly prohibited in many countries of the world - due to the danger to the health of adults.

Recently, a very large number of American children are losing consciousness after vaccinations, especially teenage girls. Experts are warning doctors to monitor children after they have received their vaccinations.

At least 463 people fainted after receiving the shots in an 18-month period from 2005 to 2007. This was reported by specialists from the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Why they reported only at the end of 2011 is a question. Fainting in itself is not dangerous, but some patients fall to the floor and hit their heads.

In addition, one of these people, having fainted some time after the vaccination, had an accident. A fifteen-year-old boy, having lost consciousness, hit his head and died.

The report shows that some combination vaccines for children cause sudden death, but the company hides and disguises this fact in official safety reports.

There was a concealment of the truth in the documents for the combination vaccine Infanrix Hexa(a combination of diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, inactivated polio and haemophilus influenzae type b) produced by the company GSK, and Prevenar 13 produced by the company Pfizer and for a number of other vaccines. Reports suggested that dozens of sudden deaths after vaccination were not related to Infanrix Hexa. In the presented GSK The data was distorted by the time elapsed after the vaccine was administered, but the actual time elapsed after vaccination shows that the vaccine was, in fact, directly related to death.

As they say, “the devil is in the details,” and in this case, GSK gets those details wrong. Instead of indicating that death occurred within 10 days of vaccination, the reports indicate that death occurred after 10 days. By doing this, the pharmaceutical giant made it appear as if the sudden deaths occurred over a much longer period of time than they actually did. This was supposed to serve as proof that the vaccination was not involved in the sudden death of the child.

Table 36 in GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and report Pharmacovigilance reports sent to the Regulatory Authority show that almost all of the 67 reported deaths since the introduction Infanrix Hexa occurred within the first 10 days. And only two of these deaths occurred after 10 days. And GSK said all the deaths occurred randomly over a 20-day period, hinting that the cases were merely coincidental.

“If we analyze the data by looking at deaths in the first 10 days after vaccine administration and compare them with deaths in the next 10 days, it becomes clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in infants under 1 year of age occur in the first 10 days and 3% ( 2 deaths) will occur in the next 10 days,” explains Child Health Safety. “Similarly, in children over 1 year of age, 87.5% of deaths (7 deaths) occurred in the first 10 days and 12.5% ​​(1 death) occurred in the next 10 days.”

90% of sudden vaccine deaths occurred within five days of vaccination

Taking a closer look at the data tables that GSK deliberately withheld from the public domain reveals an even more shocking fact - the vast majority of sudden vaccine deaths actually occurred within five days of the introduction of the Infanrix Hexa vaccine, further confirming its involvement. Shockingly, 90% of deaths (60 deaths) occurred within five days of vaccination. And 75% of deaths occurred within three days of vaccination.

“Clustering of deaths by timing of vaccination demonstrates an association between vaccination and sudden death,” added Child Health Safety. “This indicates that it is no coincidence that the pharmaceutical giant spread out deaths over a full 20 days, rather than showing the total number of deaths for each day after vaccination. Company GlaxoSmithKline hid clustering of deaths throughout the post-vaccination period.”

You may not know, but the pharmaceutical company GSK has already been fined $3 billion for promoting the off-label use of antidepressants. The case has been dubbed the largest hush-hush healthcare fraud in US history, which speaks volumes about the company's sanctity.

If GSK is never found guilty of deliberately withholding important safety data that could have saved children from dying publicly, there is a good chance it could do something similar again, earning itself the title of the most shameful, greedy and the speculative corporation in the world (slightly falling short of Monsanto, of course).

If pharmaceutical companies really help people, why don't they develop treatments to treat the disease instead of vaccines?

There is one big problem with vaccination programs designed to protect all children from infectious diseases that may never occur. It is that the weakest children always end up suffering - or dying. A better approach, at least from a humane perspective, would be to develop effective treatments for these diseases. To treat only those children who are sick, and not to use preventive “treatment” of everyone, both healthy and sick, with the help of vaccines.

This would be the expected and correct approach if Western medicine is truly aimed at preventing the spread of disease and promoting public health. But the sad truth is that health care is not a priority - profit is the only priority. Vaccines are entirely a "guessing game" because no one can ever really know how the human body will react to them.

“To date, effective treatments have been developed for major well-known childhood diseases,” explains Child Health Safety. “This is a scandal in the scientific 21st century. If effective treatments are available, there is no need for vaccines."

And it is precisely because vaccines will become obsolete that the pharmaceutical industry continues to pretend to make drugs instead of actually making drugs. Vaccines are the main source of income for the pharmaceutical industry, which are currently paid for by the government (at taxpayer expense), so-called "emergency" vaccines, many of which never stop production.

“Educated parents can either steer their children away from harmful paths or continue to live in one of the greatest deceptions in history. "Vaccines are full of heavy metals, viruses, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) - a miracle of modern medicine," wrote Andrew Baker on NSNBC.me.